Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24452031›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2014

Honeybees (Apis mellifera) learn to discriminate the smell of organic compounds from their respective deuterated isotopomers.

Wulfila Gronenberg, Ajay Raikhelkar, Eric Abshire, Jennifer Stevens, Eric Epstein, Karin Loyola, Michael Rauscher, Stephen Buchmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Olfactory coding in honeybees.Cell and tissue research · 2021
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Experimental evaluation of the generalized vibrational theory of G protein-coupled receptor activation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Quantum effects in biology: golden rule in enzymes, olfaction, photosynthesis and magnetodetection.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2017
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Implausibility of the vibrational theory of olfaction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  9. Laying a controversial smell theory to rest.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wulfila GronenbergDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Arizona, , Tucson, AZ 85721, USA, Graduate Interdisciplinary Programe in Neuroscience, University of Arizona, , Tucson, AZ 85721, USA, Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, , Tucson, AZ 85721, USA, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, , Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
Ajay Raikhelkar
Eric Abshire
Jennifer Stevens
Eric Epstein
Karin Loyola
Michael Rauscher
Stephen Buchmann
University of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The understanding of physiological and molecular processes underlying the sense of smell has made considerable progress during the past three decades, revealing the cascade of molecular steps that lead to the activation of olfactory receptor (OR) neurons. However, the mode of primary interaction of odorant molecules with the OR proteins within the sensory cells is still enigmatic. Two different concepts try to explain these interactions: the 'odotope hypothesis' suggests that OR proteins recognize structural aspects of the odorant molecule, whereas the 'vibration hypothesis' proposes that intra-molecular vibrations are the basis for the recognition of the odorant by the receptor protein. The vibration hypothesis predicts that OR proteins should be able to discriminate compounds containing deuterium from their common counterparts which contain hydrogen instead of deuterium. This study tests this prediction in honeybees (Apis mellifera) using the proboscis extension reflex learning in a differential conditioning paradigm. Rewarding one odour (e.g. a deuterated compound) with sucrose and not rewarding the respective analogue (e.g. hydrogen-based odorant) shows that honeybees readily learn to discriminate hydrogen-based odorants from their deuterated counterparts and supports the idea that intra-molecular vibrations may contribute to odour discrimination.

Indexed as

OdorantsSmellAnimalsBeesConditioning, ClassicalLearningVolatile Organic CompoundsVolatile Organic Compoundsdifferential conditioningproboscis extension reflexvibration hypothesis of olfaction

Identifiers

PMID24452031
PMCPMC3906951
OpenAlexW2051313339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.