Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24452028›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2014

A syndrome of mutualism reinforces the lifestyle of a sloth.

Jonathan N Pauli, Jorge E Mendoza, Shawn A Steffan, Cayelan C Carey, Paul J Weimer, M Zachariah Peery

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. On the move: sloths and their epibionts as model mobile ecosystems.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Tradeoffs in the evolution of plant farming by ants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan N PauliDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, , Madison, WI 53706, USA, USDA-ARS, Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, , Madison, WI 53706, USA, Center for Limnology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, , Madison, WI 53706, USA, USDA-ARS, Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, , Madison, WI 53706, USA, Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, , Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Jorge E Mendoza
Shawn A Steffan
Cayelan C Carey
Paul J Weimer
M Zachariah Peery
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arboreal herbivory is rare among mammals. The few species with this lifestyle possess unique adaptions to overcome size-related constraints on nutritional energetics. Sloths are folivores that spend most of their time resting or eating in the forest canopy. A three-toed sloth will, however, descend its tree weekly to defecate, which is risky, energetically costly and, until now, inexplicable. We hypothesized that this behaviour sustains an ecosystem in the fur of sloths, which confers cryptic nutritional benefits to sloths. We found that the more specialized three-toed sloths harboured more phoretic moths, greater concentrations of inorganic nitrogen and higher algal biomass than the generalist two-toed sloths. Moth density was positively related to inorganic nitrogen concentration and algal biomass in the fur. We discovered that sloths consumed algae from their fur, which was highly digestible and lipid-rich. By descending a tree to defecate, sloths transport moths to their oviposition sites in sloth dung, which facilitates moth colonization of sloth fur. Moths are portals for nutrients, increasing nitrogen levels in sloth fur, which fuels algal growth. Sloths consume these algae-gardens, presumably to augment their limited diet. These linked mutualisms between moths, sloths and algae appear to aid the sloth in overcoming a highly constrained lifestyle.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalSymbiosisAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBiomassChlorophytaDefecationEcosystemFeeding BehaviorHerbivoryMothsNitrogenOvipositionSlothsNitrogencommensalismCosta RicaCryptosesTrichophilus

Identifiers

PMID24452028
PMCPMC3906947
OpenAlexW2022372361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.