Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24451199›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2014

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography and biomarkers for early treatment response evaluation in metastatic colon cancer.

Bodil E Engelmann, Annika Loft, Andreas Kjær, Hans J Nielsen, Thomas A Gerds, Eric V Benzon, Nils Brünner, Ib J Christensen, Susanne H Hansson, Niels H Holländer and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2017
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Bodil E EngelmannDepartments of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Clinical Pathology, and Radiology, Næstved Hospital, Næstved, Denmark; Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark; Department of Public Health, Core Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Institute of Veterinary Disease Biology, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark; Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, and Biotech Research and Innovation Center, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Annika Loft
Andreas Kjær
Hans J Nielsen
Thomas A Gerds
Eric V Benzon
Nils Brünner
Ib J Christensen
Susanne H Hansson
Niels H Holländer
Michael H Kristensen
Johan Löfgren
Elena Markova
Carsten Sloth
Liselotte Højgaard
Rigshospitalet · DKNæstved Sygehus · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKHvidovre Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment options for metastatic colon cancer (mCC) are widening. We prospectively evaluated serial 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and measurements of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and liberated domain I of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR(I)) for early assessment of treatment response in mCC patients.

methodsThirty-three mCC patients scheduled for first-line chemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and bevacizumab participated; 27 were evaluated by PET/CT before treatment, after one and four treatment series. Morphological and metabolic response was independently assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer PET criteria. Plasma TIMP-1, plasma uPAR(I), and serum CEA were determined.

resultsMetabolic response after one treatment course predicted the ability of CAPOX and bevacizumab to induce morphological response after four treatment series with a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 69%, and odds ratio of 13.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9; 182). Early metabolically stable or progressive disease was associated with shorter progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.2 [CI 1.3; 7.8]). Biomarker levels at early evaluation were associated with shorter OS (TIMP-1 per unit increase on a log-2-transformed ng/mL scale: HR = 2.6 [CI 1.4; 4.9]; uPAR(I) per 25 fmol/mL increase: HR = 1.5 [CI 1.1; 2.1]).

conclusionThis monocentric study demonstrated predictive value of early metabolic PET response and prognostic value of TIMP-1 and uPAR(I) levels in mCC treated with CAPOX and bevacizumab. Results support investigation of PET/CT, TIMP-1, and uPAR(I) guided early treatment adaptation in mCC.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabBiomarkers, TumorCapecitabineColorectal NeoplasmsDeoxycytidineFemaleFluorouracilHumansMaleAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabBiomarkers, TumorCapecitabineDeoxycytidineFluorodeoxyglucose F18FluorouracilOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatinRadiopharmaceuticalsCarcinoembryonic antigenMetastatic colon cancerPositron-emission tomographyTissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1Treatment response evaluationUrokinase plasminogen activator receptor domain I

Identifiers

PMID24451199
PMCPMC3926791
OpenAlexW2148249328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.