Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24450836›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2014

Tick capillary feeding for the study of proteins involved in tick-pathogen interactions as potential antigens for the control of tick infestation and pathogen infection.

Sandra Antunes, Octavio Merino, Juan Mosqueda, Juan A Moreno-Cid, Lesley Bell-Sakyi, Rennos Fragkoudis, Sabine Weisheit, José M Pérez de la Lastra, Pilar Alberdi, Ana Domingos and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advances inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Changes in theFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Challenges in Veterinary Vaccine Development.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Tick Cell Lines in Research on Tick Control.Frontiers in physiology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Functional Evolution of Subolesin/Akirin.Frontiers in physiology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Sandra Antunes
Octavio Merino
Juan Mosqueda
Juan A Moreno-Cid
Lesley Bell-Sakyi
Rennos Fragkoudis
Sabine Weisheit
José M Pérez de la Lastra
Pilar Alberdi
Ana Domingos
José de la FuenteSaBio, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC-CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, Ronda de Toledo s/n, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain. jose_delafuente@yahoo.com.
Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos · ESInstituto de Investigação Científica Tropical · PTThe Pirbright Institute · GBAutonomous University of Queretaro · MXConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESOklahoma State University · USRoslin Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTicks represent a significant health risk to animals and humans due to the variety of pathogens they can transmit during feeding. The traditional use of chemicals to control ticks has serious drawbacks, including the selection of acaricide-resistant ticks and environmental contamination with chemical residues. Vaccination with the tick midgut antigen BM86 was shown to be a good alternative for cattle tick control. However, results vary considerably between tick species and geographic location. Therefore, new antigens are required for the development of vaccines controlling both tick infestations and pathogen infection/transmission. Tick proteins involved in tick-pathogen interactions may provide good candidate protective antigens for these vaccines, but appropriate screening procedures are needed to select the best candidates.

methodsIn this study, we selected proteins involved in tick-Anaplasma (Subolesin and SILK) and tick-Babesia (TROSPA) interactions and used in vitro capillary feeding to characterize their potential as antigens for the control of cattle tick infestations and infection with Anaplasma marginale and Babesia bigemina. Purified rabbit polyclonal antibodies were generated against recombinant SUB, SILK and TROSPA and added to uninfected or infected bovine blood to capillary-feed female Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus ticks. Tick weight, oviposition and pathogen DNA levels were determined in treated and control ticks.

resultsThe specificity of purified rabbit polyclonal antibodies against tick recombinant proteins was confirmed by Western blot and against native proteins in tick cell lines and tick tissues using immunofluorescence. Capillary-fed ticks ingested antibodies added to the blood meal and the effect of these antibodies on tick weight and oviposition was shown. However, no effect was observed on pathogen DNA levels.

conclusionsThese results highlighted the advantages and some of the disadvantages of in vitro tick capillary feeding for the characterization of candidate tick protective antigens. While an effect on tick weight and oviposition was observed, the effect on pathogen levels was not evident probably due to high tick-to-tick variations among other factors. Nevertheless, these results together with previous results of RNA interference functional studies suggest that these proteins are good candidate vaccine antigens for the control of R. microplus infestations and infection with A. marginale and B. bigemina.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorHost-Pathogen InteractionsAnaplasmaAnimalsAntibodiesBabesiaFemaleGene ExpressionInsect ProteinsOvipositionRecombinant ProteinsTick InfestationsTicksAntibodiesInsect ProteinsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24450836
PMCPMC3900739
OpenAlexW2125583162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.