Observational studyRespiratory research2014
Early versus later response to treatment in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: analysis of the REACH study.
Observational study in Respiratory research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01293435 (Observational Study to Assess Clinical Management Patterns in Patients With Hospitalised Community-Acquired Pneumonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Observational Study to Assess Clinical Management Patterns in Patients With Hospitalised Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) or Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections (cSSSI)
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Traditional Chinese Medicine treatment with syndrome differentiation for patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan · 2025Trial
- Metagenomic-based quantification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa burden links microbiome collapse to mortality in severe community-acquired pneumonia.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- How to approach a patient hospitalized for pneumonia who is not responding to treatment?Intensive care medicine · 2025Review
- Differentiation Between Responders and Non-Responders to Antibiotic Treatment in Mice UsingMolecular imaging and biology · 2024Article
- Reassessing Halm's clinical stability criteria in community-acquired pneumonia management.The European respiratory journal · 2024Article
- Community-Acquired Pneumonia in the Immunocompromised Patients: An Observational Study from a Single Center, TURKEY.Infection and drug resistance · 2024Article
- Ceft-to-Ceft Study: Real-Life Experience with Ceftaroline and Ceftobiprole in Treatment of the Principal Infectious Syndromes in a Spanish Multicenter Hospital Cohort.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Severe community-acquired Streptococcus pneumoniae bacterial meningitis: clinical and prognostic picture from the intensive care unit.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Observational
- Multi-Modal Data Analysis for Pneumonia Status Prediction Using Deep Learning (MDA-PSP).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in adults: An update.The Indian journal of medical research · 2020Review
- Progression of the Radiologic Severity Index is associated with increased mortality and healthcare resource utilisation in acute leukaemia patients with pneumonia.BMJ open respiratory research · 2019Article
- Predictors and Implications of Early Clinical Stability in Patients Hospitalized for Moderately Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia.PloS one · 2016Article
- Community-acquired pneumonia.Lancet (London, England) · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKey goals in the treatment of CAP include early response to treatment and achievement of clinical stability. The US FDA recommends early response endpoints (72 hours after initiation of treatment) in clinical trials for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. REACH (REtrospective Study to Assess the Clinical Management of Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections [cSSTI] or CAP in the Hospital Setting) was a retrospective observational study, providing current data on the clinical management and resource burden of CAP in real-life settings in European hospitals. This analysis reviews the characteristics and outcomes of patients showing early positive response to treatment (time to clinical stability [TCS] ≤4 days, as assessed by Halm's criteria) compared with patients with later positive response (TCS >4 days).
methodsPatients were adults, hospitalized with CAP (2010-2011) and requiring in-hospital treatment with intravenous antibiotics.
resultsOf the 2039 patients included in REACH, 585 (28.7%) had TCS assessed by Halm's criteria: 332 (56.8%) showed early response (median 3.0 days), and 253 (43.2%) showed later response to treatment (median 7.0 days). Use of Halm's criteria varied across participating countries, ranging from 0% (Belgium) to 49.1% (UK). Patient characteristics and relevant medical history were similar between the two groups. There were no notable differences in initial antibiotic therapy between groups, except that more early responders had been treated with amoxicillin-clavulanate and amoxicillin monotherapy (22.6%; 7.5%, respectively) than later responders (5.9%; 1.2%, respectively). Initial treatment modification and re-infection or recurrences were less frequent in early responders compared with later responders (14.2% and 3.3% vs. 34.8% and 5.9%, respectively). Early responders had a shorter duration of hospitalization (mean 9.4 ± SD 7.0; median 8.0 days vs. mean 15.6 ± SD 10.5; median 12.0 days, respectively), lower rate of ICU admission (3.3% vs. 21.3%) and shorter duration of ICU stay (mean 6.2 ± SD 5.7; median 4.0 days vs. mean 10.4 ± SD 10.1; median 8.0 days, respectively) compared with later responders. Mortality was low in both groups.
conclusionsAchieving early clinical stabilization in CAP (≤4 days) is associated with improved outcomes, lower requirement for initial treatment modification or readmission and lower resource use, compared with a later response.
trial registrationNCT01293435.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.