Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24450444›Full record

Observational studyRespiratory research2014

Early versus later response to treatment in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: analysis of the REACH study.

Francesco Blasi, Helmut Ostermann, Jill Racketa, Jesús Medina, Kyle McBride, Javier Garau, REACH study group

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Respiratory research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01293435 (Observational Study to Assess Clinical Management Patterns in Patients With Hospitalised Community-Acquired Pneumonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01293435 completednot on this map

Observational Study to Assess Clinical Management Patterns in Patients With Hospitalised Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) or Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections (cSSSI)

TypeobservationalSponsorAstraZenecaRan2011 to 2011Enrolled4,035ConditionsCommunity Acquired Pneumonia (CAP), Complicated Skin and Skin Structures Infections (cSSSI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in adults: An update.The Indian journal of medical research · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Community-acquired pneumonia.Lancet (London, England) · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francesco BlasiDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, IRCCS Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore, Policlinico Cà Granda Milano, Italy. francesco.blasi@unimi.it.
Helmut Ostermann
Jill Racketa
Jesús Medina
Kyle McBride
Javier Garau
REACH study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKey goals in the treatment of CAP include early response to treatment and achievement of clinical stability. The US FDA recommends early response endpoints (72 hours after initiation of treatment) in clinical trials for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. REACH (REtrospective Study to Assess the Clinical Management of Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections [cSSTI] or CAP in the Hospital Setting) was a retrospective observational study, providing current data on the clinical management and resource burden of CAP in real-life settings in European hospitals. This analysis reviews the characteristics and outcomes of patients showing early positive response to treatment (time to clinical stability [TCS] ≤4 days, as assessed by Halm's criteria) compared with patients with later positive response (TCS >4 days).

methodsPatients were adults, hospitalized with CAP (2010-2011) and requiring in-hospital treatment with intravenous antibiotics.

resultsOf the 2039 patients included in REACH, 585 (28.7%) had TCS assessed by Halm's criteria: 332 (56.8%) showed early response (median 3.0 days), and 253 (43.2%) showed later response to treatment (median 7.0 days). Use of Halm's criteria varied across participating countries, ranging from 0% (Belgium) to 49.1% (UK). Patient characteristics and relevant medical history were similar between the two groups. There were no notable differences in initial antibiotic therapy between groups, except that more early responders had been treated with amoxicillin-clavulanate and amoxicillin monotherapy (22.6%; 7.5%, respectively) than later responders (5.9%; 1.2%, respectively). Initial treatment modification and re-infection or recurrences were less frequent in early responders compared with later responders (14.2% and 3.3% vs. 34.8% and 5.9%, respectively). Early responders had a shorter duration of hospitalization (mean 9.4 ± SD 7.0; median 8.0 days vs. mean 15.6 ± SD 10.5; median 12.0 days, respectively), lower rate of ICU admission (3.3% vs. 21.3%) and shorter duration of ICU stay (mean 6.2 ± SD 5.7; median 4.0 days vs. mean 10.4 ± SD 10.1; median 8.0 days, respectively) compared with later responders. Mortality was low in both groups.

conclusionsAchieving early clinical stabilization in CAP (≤4 days) is associated with improved outcomes, lower requirement for initial treatment modification or readmission and lower resource use, compared with a later response.

trial registrationNCT01293435.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsCohort StudiesCommunity-Acquired InfectionsEarly DiagnosisHospitalizationHumansInfusions, IntravenousMiddle AgedPneumoniaRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID24450444
PMCPMC3903813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.