Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24449900›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Parameterizing cell-to-cell regulatory heterogeneities via stochastic transcriptional profiles.

Sameer S Bajikar, Christiane Fuchs, Andreas Roller, Fabian J Theis, Kevin A Janes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sameer S BajikarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908.
Christiane Fuchs
Andreas Roller
Fabian J Theis
Kevin A Janes
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DEUniversity of Virginia · USTechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

Women's Oncology Program - WONP30CA044579 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Thomas P. Loughran · 1987 to 2026
$72.1M
Stochastic Control of Abnormal Morphogenesis Induced by the ErbB2 OncoproteinDP2OD006464 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI JANES, KEVIN A · 2009 to 2009
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA044579NIH HHS 1-DP2-OD006464NIH HHS DP2 OD006464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulated changes in gene expression underlie many biological processes, but globally profiling cell-to-cell variations in transcriptional regulation is problematic when measuring single cells. Transcriptome-wide identification of regulatory heterogeneities can be robustly achieved by randomly collecting small numbers of cells followed by statistical analysis. However, this stochastic-profiling approach blurs out the expression states of the individual cells in each pooled sample. Here, we show that the underlying distribution of single-cell regulatory states can be deconvolved from stochastic-profiling data through maximum-likelihood inference. Guided by the mechanisms of transcriptional regulation, we formulated plausible mixture models for cell-to-cell regulatory heterogeneity and maximized the resulting likelihood functions to infer model parameters. Inferences were validated both computationally and experimentally for different mixture models, which included regulatory states for multicellular function that were occupied by as few as 1 in 40 cells of the population. Importantly, when the method was extended to programs of heterogeneously coexpressed transcripts, we found that population-level inferences were much more accurate with pooled samples than with one-cell samples when the extent of sampling was limited. Our deconvolution method provides a means to quantify the heterogeneous regulation of molecular states efficiently and gain a deeper understanding of the heterogeneous execution of cell decisions.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticAnimalsCellsCluster AnalysisGene Expression RegulationHumansLikelihood FunctionsModels, BiologicalPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProbabilityReproducibility of ResultsStochastic ProcessesPhosphatidylinositol 3-Kinasesbreast cancermorphogenesisnoisesystems biology

Identifiers

PMID24449900
PMCPMC3918796
OpenAlexW2092033222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.