Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24449852›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Nonautonomous contact guidance signaling during collective cell migration.

Camila Londono, M Jimena Loureiro, Benjamin Slater, Petra B Lücker, John Soleas, Suthamathy Sathananthan, J Stewart Aitchison, Alexandre J Kabla, Alison P McGuigan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Light-Induced Nanoscale Deformation in Azobenzene Thin Film Triggers Rapid Intracellular CaAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  5. Migration and division in cell monolayers on substrates with topological defects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Multi-scale analysis and modelling of collective migration in biological systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Camila LondonoInstitute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering and Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3E5.
M Jimena Loureiro
Benjamin Slater
Petra B Lücker
John Soleas
Suthamathy Sathananthan
J Stewart Aitchison
Alexandre J Kabla
Alison P McGuigan
University of Toronto · CAUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Directed migration of groups of cells is a critical aspect of tissue morphogenesis that ensures proper tissue organization and, consequently, function. Cells moving in groups, unlike single cells, must coordinate their migratory behavior to maintain tissue integrity. During directed migration, cells are guided by a combination of mechanical and chemical cues presented by neighboring cells and the surrounding extracellular matrix. One important class of signals that guide cell migration includes topographic cues. Although the contact guidance response of individual cells to topographic cues has been extensively characterized, little is known about the response of groups of cells to topographic cues, the impact of such cues on cell-cell coordination within groups, and the transmission of nonautonomous contact guidance information between neighboring cells. Here, we explore these phenomena by quantifying the migratory response of confluent monolayers of epithelial and fibroblast cells to contact guidance cues provided by grooved topography. We show that, in both sparse clusters and confluent sheets, individual cells are contact-guided by grooves and show more coordinated behavior on grooved versus flat substrates. Furthermore, we demonstrate both in vitro and in silico that the guidance signal provided by a groove can propagate between neighboring cells in a confluent monolayer, and that the distance over which signal propagation occurs is not significantly influenced by the strength of cell-cell junctions but is an emergent property, similar to cellular streaming, triggered by mechanical exclusion interactions within the collective system.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationCell MovementSignal TransductionCell CountCell LineEpithelial CellsFibroblastsHumansIntercellular JunctionsMaleModels, Biologicalcorrelation lengthemergent behaviorgroup coordinationmechanical signal propagation

Identifiers

PMID24449852
PMCPMC3918762
OpenAlexW2066098137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.