Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24449267›Full record

ReviewGenes & development2014

Cellular senescence and its effector programs.

Rafik Salama, Mahito Sadaie, Matthew Hoare, Masashi Narita

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & development, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 500 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
500citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

500 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. What Do We Know About Immune System Aging from Human and Animal Studies?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Transcriptional regulation in cardiovascular aging.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

440 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rafik SalamaCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom;
Mahito Sadaie
Matthew Hoare
Masashi Narita

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15890CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular senescence is a stress response that accompanies stable exit from the cell cycle. Classically, senescence, particularly in human cells, involves the p53 and p16/Rb pathways, and often both of these tumor suppressor pathways need to be abrogated to bypass senescence. In parallel, a number of effector mechanisms of senescence have been identified and characterized. These studies suggest that senescence is a collective phenotype of these multiple effectors, and their intensity and combination can be different depending on triggers and cell types, conferring a complex and diverse nature to senescence. Series of studies on senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) in particular have revealed various layers of functionality of senescent cells in vivo. Here we discuss some key features of senescence effectors and attempt to functionally link them when it is possible.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell NucleusCellular SenescenceChromatinGene Expression RegulationHumansChromatinagingDNA damageinflammationmetabolismoncogenessenescencetumor suppressors

Identifiers

PMID24449267
PMCPMC3909793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.