Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24449256›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2014

Management of recurrent thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome.

Cecilia Nalli, Laura Andreoli, Cinzia Casu, Angela Tincani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neurologic Manifestations of Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Clinical Characteristics and Management of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis in Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cecilia NalliRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Spedali Civili and University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy, nalli@bresciareumatologia.it.
Laura Andreoli
Cinzia Casu
Angela Tincani
University of Brescia · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the challenges of managing patients with antiphospholipid syndrome is the prevention of rethrombosis (secondary prophylaxis). Risk stratification, i.e. traditional cardiovascular and thrombosis risk factors, systemic autoimmune diseases, antiphospholipid antibody profile, and the intensity of anticoagulation are all relevant to the management of APS patients with recurrent thrombosis. The paper will review "state of the art" strategies for optimizing therapy for APS patients with recurrent thrombosis.

Indexed as

Antibodies, AntiphospholipidAnticoagulantsAntiphospholipid SyndromeBiomarkersHumansRisk FactorsSecondary PreventionThrombosisAntibodies, AntiphospholipidAnticoagulantsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID24449256
OpenAlexW2054416239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.