Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24449229›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2014

Telehealth personalized cancer risk communication to motivate colonoscopy in relatives of patients with colorectal cancer: the family CARE Randomized controlled trial.

Anita Y Kinney, Watcharaporn Boonyasiriwat, Scott T Walters, Lisa M Pappas, Antoinette M Stroup, Marc D Schwartz, Sandra L Edwards, Amy Rogers, Wendy K Kohlmann, Kenneth M Boucher and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02225015 (Cancer Prevention in Women With a BRCA Mutation), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02225015 phase1unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Cancer Prevention in Women With a BRCA Mutation: A Follow-up Genetic Counselling Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorWomen's College HospitalRan2015 to 2019Enrolled300ConditionsBRCA1 Gene Mutation, BRCA2 Gene Mutation, Breast Cancer, Ovarian CancerArmsFollow-up Telephone Genetic Counselling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. An RCT to Increase Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening.American journal of preventive medicine · 2020
    Trial
  9. Comparative Effectiveness of Two Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening for Those at Increased Risk Based on Family History: Results of a Randomized Trial.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. A Randomized Trial to Compare a Tailored Web-Based Intervention and Tailored Phone Counseling to Usual Care for Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2018
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone Delivery of BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling Compared With In-Person Counseling: 1-Year Follow-Up.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Efficacy of a Telehealth Intervention on Colonoscopy Uptake When Cost Is a Barrier: The Family CARE Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2015
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Anita Y KinneyAnita Y. Kinney, Antoinette M. Stroup, Sandra L. Edwards, Kenneth M. Boucher, and Randall W. Burt, School of Medicine, University of Utah; Anita Y. Kinney, Lisa M. Pappas, Antoinette M. Stroup, Sandra L. Edwards, Amy Rogers, Wendy K. Kohlmann, Kenneth M. Boucher, Rebecca G. Simmons, and Randall W. Burt, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah; Marc S. Williams, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT; Watcharaporn Boonyasiriwat, Chulalongkom University, Bangkok, Thailand; Scott T. Walters, School of Public Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth, Fort Worth; Sally W. Vernon, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX; Marc D. Schwartz, Georgetown University; Marc D. Schwartz, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Jan T. Lowery, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Kristina Flores, University of New Mexico Cancer Center; Anita Y. Kinney, Charles L. Wiggins, and Deirdre A. Hill, University of New Mexico Cancer Center and School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM; Marc S. Williams, Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA; John C. Higginbotham, Community and Rural Medicine Institute for Rural Health Research, College of Community Health Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
Watcharaporn Boonyasiriwat
Scott T Walters
Lisa M Pappas
Antoinette M Stroup
Marc D Schwartz
Sandra L Edwards
Amy Rogers
Wendy K Kohlmann
Kenneth M Boucher
Sally W Vernon
Rebecca G Simmons
Jan T Lowery
Kristina Flores
Charles L Wiggins
Deirdre A Hill
Randall W Burt
Marc S Williams
John C Higginbotham

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jared P Rutter · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
Impact of Remote Familial Risk Assessment and CounselingR01CA125194 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI KINNEY, ANITA Y. · 2008 to 2012
$3.1M
NOVEL NUCLEAR PROTEINS IN NORMAL AND CANCER CELLSR01CA054404 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PASTERNACK, GARY R. · 1992 to 1999
–
NOVEL NUCLEAR PROTEINS IN NORMAL AND CANCER CELLSR55CA054404 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PASTERNACK, GARY R. · 1991 to 1991
–
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA125194-0305NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000026CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000033CNCI NIH HHS N01 PC035139NCI NIH HHS N01 PC054404NCI NIH HHS P30 CA042014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe rate of adherence to regular colonoscopy screening in individuals at increased familial risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) is suboptimal, especially among rural and other geographically underserved populations. Remote interventions may overcome geographic and system-level barriers. We compared the efficacy of a telehealth-based personalized risk assessment and communication intervention with a mailed educational brochure for improving colonoscopy screening among at-risk relatives of patients with CRC.

methodsEligible individuals age 30 to 74 years who were not up-to-date with risk-appropriate screening and were not candidates for genetic testing were recruited after contacting patients with CRC or their next of kin in five states. Enrollees were randomly assigned as family units to either an active, personalized intervention that incorporated evidence-based risk communication and behavior change techniques, or a mailed educational brochure. The primary outcome was medically verified colonoscopy within 9 months of the intervention.

resultsOf the 481 eligible and randomly assigned at-risk relatives, 79.8% completed the outcome assessments within 9 months; 35.4% of those in the personalized intervention group and 15.7% of those in the comparison group obtained a colonoscopy. In an intent-to-treat analysis, the telehealth group was almost three times as likely to get screened as the low-intensity comparison group (odds ratio, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.87 to 4.28; P < .001). Persons residing in rural areas and those with lower incomes benefitted at the same level as did urban residents.

conclusionRemote personalized interventions that consider family history and incorporate evidence-based risk communication and behavior change strategies may promote risk-appropriate screening in close relatives of patients with CRC.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerFamilyMass ScreeningAdultAgedColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPrecision MedicineRisk AssessmentRural PopulationTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID24449229
PMCPMC3927734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.