ArticleBMJ open2014
Developing a complex intervention to improve prescribing safety in primary care: mixed methods feasibility and optimisation pilot study.
Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01425502 (Data-driven Quality Improvement in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Data-driven Quality Improvement in Primary Care: Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial to Test the Effectiveness of a Multifaceted Intervention in Reducing High Risk Prescribing of Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Antiplatelet Agents
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review of Economic Aspects of Service Interventions to Increase Anticoagulation Use in Atrial Fibrillation.Thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022Pooled it
- Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT): a new theory for designing, implementing, and evaluating feedback in health care based on a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research.Implementation science : IS · 2019Pooled it
- Trial
- Process evaluation of the data-driven quality improvement in primary care (DQIP) trial: active and less active ingredients of a multi-component complex intervention to reduce high-risk primary care prescribing.Implementation science : IS · 2017Trial
- Nurse-Led Medicines' Monitoring for Patients with Dementia in Care Homes: A Pragmatic Cohort Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Trial.PloS one · 2015Trial
- Audit and feedback to reduce unwarranted clinical variation at scale: a realist study of implementation strategy mechanisms.Implementation science : IS · 2023Article
- General practice responses to opioid prescribing feedback: a qualitative process evaluation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021Article
- Post-discharge care following acute kidney injury: quality improvement in primary care.BMJ open quality · 2020Article
- Facilitating action planning within audit and feedback interventions: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an action implementation toolbox in intensive care.Implementation science : IS · 2019Article
- Clinical performance comparators in audit and feedback: a review of theory and evidence.Implementation science : IS · 2019Review
- Multi-method laboratory user evaluation of an actionable clinical performance information system: Implications for usability and patient safety.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2018Article
- Electronic audit and feedback intervention with action implementation toolbox to improve pain management in intensive care: protocol for a laboratory experiment and cluster randomised trial.Implementation science : IS · 2017Article
- Article
- A practical Bayesian stepped wedge design for community-based cluster-randomized clinical trials: The British Columbia Telehealth Trial.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2016Article
- Interface design recommendations for computerised clinical audit and feedback: Hybrid usability evidence from a research-led system.International journal of medical informatics · 2016Article
- The dangers of NSAIDs: look both ways.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016Article
- Optimisation of complex health interventions prior to a randomised controlled trial: a scoping review of strategies used.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2016Article
- Promoting Safer Use of High-Risk Pharmacotherapy: Impact of Pharmacist-Led Targeted Medication Reviews.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2015Article
- Optimizing Study Design for Evaluating Complex Interventions: An Example of a Feasibility Study in Person-Centered and Integrated Chronic Disease Care in Dutch General Practice.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectives(A) To measure the extent to which different candidate outcome measures identified high-risk prescribing that is potentially changeable by the data-driven quality improvement in primary care (DQIP) intervention.(B) To explore the value of reviewing identified high-risk prescribing to clinicians.(C) To optimise the components of the DQIP intervention.
designMixed method study.
settingGeneral practices in two Scottish Health boards.
participants4 purposively sampled general practices of varying size and socioeconomic deprivation. OUTCOME MEASURES: Prescribing measures targeting (1) high-risk use of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and antiplatelets; (2) 'Asthma control' and (3) 'Antithrombotics in atrial fibrillation (AF)'.
interventionThe prescribing measures were used to identify patients for review by general practices. The ability of the measures to identify potentially changeable high-risk prescribing was measured as the proportion of patients reviewed where practices identified a need for action. Field notes were recorded from meetings between researchers and staff and key staff participated in semistructured interviews exploring their experience of the piloted intervention processes.
resultsPractices identified a need for action in 68%, 25% and 18% of patients reviewed for prescribing measures (1), (2) and (3), respectively. General practitioners valued being prompted to review patients, and perceived that (1) 'NSAID and antiplatelet' and (2) 'antithrombotics in AF' were the most important to act on. Barriers to initial and ongoing engagement and to sustaining improvements in prescribing were identified.
conclusions'NSAIDs and antiplatelets' measures were selected as the most suitable outcome measures for the DQIP trial, based on evidence of this prescribing being more easily changeable. In response to the barriers identified, the intervention was designed to include a financial incentive, additional ongoing feedback on progress and reprompting review of patients, whose high-risk prescribing was restarted after a decision to stop. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01425502.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.