ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2014
Predicting DNA-binding sites of proteins based on sequential and 3D structural information.
Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- iTTCA-MFF: identifying tumor T cell antigens based on multiple feature fusion.Immunogenetics · 2022Article
- DeepDISE: DNA Binding Site Prediction Using a Deep Learning Method.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- iProDNA-CapsNet: identifying protein-DNA binding residues using capsule neural networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Article
- Identification of DNA-protein Binding Sites through Multi-Scale Local Average Blocks on Sequence Information.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- RBscore&NBench: a high-level web server for nucleic acid binding residues prediction with a large-scale benchmarking database.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites by means of ensemble learning and weighted feature descriptor.Journal of biological research (Thessalonike, Greece) · 2016Article
- A Large-Scale Assessment of Nucleic Acids Binding Site Prediction Programs.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- An overview of the prediction of protein DNA-binding sites.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein-DNA interactions play important roles in many biological processes. To understand the molecular mechanisms of protein-DNA interaction, it is necessary to identify the DNA-binding sites in DNA-binding proteins. In the last decade, computational approaches have been developed to predict protein-DNA-binding sites based solely on protein sequences. In this study, we developed a novel predictor based on support vector machine algorithm coupled with the maximum relevance minimum redundancy method followed by incremental feature selection. We incorporated not only features of physicochemical/biochemical properties, sequence conservation, residual disorder, secondary structure, solvent accessibility, but also five three-dimensional (3D) structural features calculated from PDB data to predict the protein-DNA interaction sites. Feature analysis showed that 3D structural features indeed contributed to the prediction of DNA-binding site and it was demonstrated that the prediction performance was better with 3D structural features than without them. It was also shown via analysis of features from each site that the features of DNA-binding site itself contribute the most to the prediction. Our prediction method may become a useful tool for identifying the DNA-binding sites and the feature analysis described in this paper may provide useful insights for in-depth investigations into the mechanisms of protein-DNA interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24448651What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.