Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24448544›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2014

The 'extremely ancient' chromosome that isn't: a forensic bioinformatic investigation of Albert Perry's X-degenerate portion of the Y chromosome.

Eran Elhaik, Tatiana V Tatarinova, Anatole A Klyosov, Dan Graur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. aYChr-DB: a database of ancient human Y haplogroups.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2020
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reply to 'The 'extremely ancient' chromosome that isn't' by Elhaik et al.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2015
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eran Elhaik1] Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA [2] Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, UK.
Tatiana V TatarinovaDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles and Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Anatole A KlyosovThe Academy of DNA Genealogy, Newton, MA, USA.
Dan GraurDepartment of Biology & Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

Populaton Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Optimal ControlR01GM068968 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI NEELY, MICHAEL N. · 2003 to 2015
$3.9M
Mechanisms of Hypothermic Neuroprotection in NeonatesR01HD070996 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI NORTHINGTON, FRANCES J · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS HD070996NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD070996NIGMS NIH HHS GM068968NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM068968
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mendez and colleagues reported the identification of a Y chromosome haplotype (the A00 lineage) that lies at the basal position of the Y chromosome phylogenetic tree. Incorporating this haplotype, the authors estimated the time to the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) for the Y tree to be 338,000 years ago (95% CI=237,000-581,000). Such an extraordinarily early estimate contradicts all previous estimates in the literature and is over a 100,000 years older than the earliest fossils of anatomically modern humans. This estimate raises two astonishing possibilities, either the novel Y chromosome was inherited after ancestral humans interbred with another species, or anatomically modern Homo sapiens emerged earlier than previously estimated and quickly became subdivided into genetically differentiated subpopulations. We demonstrate that the TMRCA estimate was reached through inadequate statistical and analytical methods, each of which contributed to its inflation. We show that the authors ignored previously inferred Y-specific rates of substitution, incorrectly derived the Y-specific substitution rate from autosomal mutation rates, and compared unequal lengths of the novel Y chromosome with the previously recognized basal lineage. Our analysis indicates that the A00 lineage was derived from all the other lineages 208,300 (95% CI=163,900-260,200) years ago.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularChromosomes, Human, XChromosomes, Human, YFossilsHaplotypesHumansMutationPolymorphism, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID24448544
PMCPMC4135414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.