ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2014
The 'extremely ancient' chromosome that isn't: a forensic bioinformatic investigation of Albert Perry's X-degenerate portion of the Y chromosome.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- aYChr-DB: a database of ancient human Y haplogroups.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Review
- Between Lake Baikal and the Baltic Sea: genomic history of the gateway to Europe.BMC genetics · 2017Article
- Large-scale recent expansion of European patrilineages shown by population resequencing.Nature communications · 2015Article
- Reply to 'The 'extremely ancient' chromosome that isn't' by Elhaik et al.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2015Article
- Reply to Mendez et al: the 'extremely ancient' chromosome that still isn't.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2015Article
- The Y-chromosome tree bursts into leaf: 13,000 high-confidence SNPs covering the majority of known clades.Molecular biology and evolution · 2015Article
- Article
- Differential Evolution approach to detect recent admixture.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Evaluating the Y chromosomal timescale in human demographic and lineage dating.Investigative genetics · 2014Review
- Human paternal and maternal demographic histories: insights from high-resolution Y chromosome and mtDNA sequences.Investigative genetics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mendez and colleagues reported the identification of a Y chromosome haplotype (the A00 lineage) that lies at the basal position of the Y chromosome phylogenetic tree. Incorporating this haplotype, the authors estimated the time to the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) for the Y tree to be 338,000 years ago (95% CI=237,000-581,000). Such an extraordinarily early estimate contradicts all previous estimates in the literature and is over a 100,000 years older than the earliest fossils of anatomically modern humans. This estimate raises two astonishing possibilities, either the novel Y chromosome was inherited after ancestral humans interbred with another species, or anatomically modern Homo sapiens emerged earlier than previously estimated and quickly became subdivided into genetically differentiated subpopulations. We demonstrate that the TMRCA estimate was reached through inadequate statistical and analytical methods, each of which contributed to its inflation. We show that the authors ignored previously inferred Y-specific rates of substitution, incorrectly derived the Y-specific substitution rate from autosomal mutation rates, and compared unequal lengths of the novel Y chromosome with the previously recognized basal lineage. Our analysis indicates that the A00 lineage was derived from all the other lineages 208,300 (95% CI=163,900-260,200) years ago.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.