ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2014
Interplay of choline metabolites and genes in patient-derived breast cancer xenografts.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Next generation thiazolyl ketone inhibitors of cytosolic phospholipase ANature communications · 2025Article
- Review
- Endocrine-disrupting compounds and metabolomic reprogramming in breast cancer.Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology · 2023Review
- A combined experimental-computational approach uncovers a role for the Golgi matrix protein Giantin in breast cancer progression.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Microneedle-based interstitial fluid extraction for drug analysis: Advances, challenges, and prospects.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2023Review
- Neurogenesis manifestations of solid tumor and tracer imaging studies: a narrative review.American journal of cancer research · 2023Review
- Article
- Tissue metabolites in diffuse glioma and their modulations by IDH1 mutation, histology, and treatment.JCI insight · 2022Article
- Dandelion extract inhibits triple-negative breast cancer cell proliferation by interfering with glycerophospholipids and unsaturated fatty acids metabolism.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Impact of the PdInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Review
- Choline Kinase: An Unexpected Journey for a Precision Medicine Strategy in Human Diseases.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Tissue-based metabolomics reveals potential biomarkers for cervical carcinoma and HPV infection.Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences · 2020Article
- Cytosolic Phospholipase A2 Alpha Regulates TLR Signaling and Migration in Metastatic 4T1 Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Glutamine to proline conversion is associated with response to glutaminase inhibition in breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2019Article
- HR-MAS NMR Based Quantitative Metabolomics in Breast Cancer.Metabolites · 2019Review
- Early synergistic interactions between the HPV16‑E7 oncoprotein and 17β-oestradiol for repressing the expression of Granzyme B in a cervical cancer model.International journal of oncology · 2018Article
- Histone modification profiling in breast cancer cell lines highlights commonalities and differences among subtypes.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDysregulated choline metabolism is a well-known feature of breast cancer, but the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. In this study, the metabolomic and transcriptomic characteristics of a large panel of human breast cancer xenograft models were mapped, with focus on choline metabolism.
methodsTumor specimens from 34 patient-derived xenograft models were collected and divided in two. One part was examined using high-resolution magic angle spinning (HR-MAS) MR spectroscopy while another part was analyzed using gene expression microarrays. Expression data of genes encoding proteins in the choline metabolism pathway were analyzed and correlated to the levels of choline (Cho), phosphocholine (PCho) and glycerophosphocholine (GPC) using Pearson's correlation analysis. For comparison purposes, metabolic and gene expression data were collected from human breast tumors belonging to corresponding molecular subgroups.
resultsMost of the xenograft models were classified as basal-like (N = 19) or luminal B (N = 7). These two subgroups showed significantly different choline metabolic and gene expression profiles. The luminal B xenografts were characterized by a high PCho/GPC ratio while the basal-like xenografts were characterized by highly variable PCho/GPC ratio. Also, Cho, PCho and GPC levels were correlated to expression of several genes encoding proteins in the choline metabolism pathway, including choline kinase alpha (CHKA) and glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase domain containing 5 (GDPD5). These characteristics were similar to those found in human tumor samples.
conclusionThe higher PCho/GPC ratio found in luminal B compared with most basal-like breast cancer xenograft models and human tissue samples do not correspond to results observed from in vitro studies. It is likely that microenvironmental factors play a role in the in vivo regulation of choline metabolism. Cho, PCho and GPC were correlated to different choline pathway-encoding genes in luminal B compared with basal-like xenografts, suggesting that regulation of choline metabolism may vary between different breast cancer subgroups. The concordance between the metabolic and gene expression profiles from xenograft models with breast cancer tissue samples from patients indicates that these xenografts are representative models of human breast cancer and represent relevant models to study tumor metabolism in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.