ReviewExpert opinion on drug discovery2014
Designing inhibitors of anthrax toxin.
Review in Expert opinion on drug discovery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synthetic niclosamide-loaded controlled-release nanospheres with high solubility and stability exerting multiple effects againstFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Exploring the Nature of Cationic Blocker Recognition by the Anthrax Toxin Channel.Biophysical journal · 2019Article
- A bovine CD18 signal peptide variant with increased binding activity toF1000Research · 2018Article
- Different drugs for bad bugs: antivirulence strategies in the age of antibiotic resistance.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2017Review
- Bacterial proteases, untapped antimicrobial drug targets.The Journal of antibiotics · 2017Review
- Impact of Dendrimer Terminal Group Chemistry on Blockage of the Anthrax Toxin Channel: A Single Molecule Study.Toxins · 2016Article
- Beyond Antibiotics: New Therapeutic Approaches for Bacterial Infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016Article
- Targeted Treatment for Bacterial Infections: Prospects for Pathogen-Specific Antibiotics Coupled with Rapid Diagnostics.Tetrahedron · 2016Article
- Article
- An overview of investigational toxin-directed therapies for the adjunctive management of Bacillus anthracis infection and sepsis.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2015Review
- Review
- Tailored cyclodextrin pore blocker protects mammalian cells from clostridium difficile binary toxin CDT.Toxins · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPresent-day rational drug design approaches are based on exploiting unique features of the target biomolecules, small- or macromolecule drug candidates and physical forces that govern their interactions. The 2013 Nobel Prize in chemistry awarded 'for the development of multiscale models for complex chemical systems' once again demonstrated the importance of the tailored drug discovery that reduces the role of the trial-and-error approach to a minimum. The intentional dissemination of Bacillus anthracis spores in 2001 via the so-called anthrax letters has led to increased efforts, politically and scientifically, to develop medical countermeasures that will protect people from the threat of anthrax bioterrorism. AREAS COVERED: This article provides an overview of the recent rational drug design approaches for discovering inhibitors of anthrax toxin. The review also directs the readers to the vast literature on the recognized advances and future possibilities in the field. EXPERT OPINION: Existing options to combat anthrax toxin lethality are limited. With the only anthrax toxin inhibiting therapy (protective antigen-targeting with a monoclonal antibody, raxibacumab) approved to treat inhalational anthrax, the situation, in our view, is still insecure. Further, the FDA's animal rule for drug approval, which clears compounds without validated efficacy studies on humans, creates a high level of uncertainty, especially when a well-characterized animal model does not exist. Better identification and validation of anthrax toxin therapeutic targets at the molecular level as well as elucidation of the parameters determining the corresponding therapeutic windows are still necessary for more effective therapeutic options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.