Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24447002›Full record

SynthesisJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2014

Efficacy of alcohol interventions for first-year college students: a meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials.

Lori A J Scott-Sheldon, Kate B Carey, Jennifer C Elliott, Lorra Garey, Michael P Carey

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
19.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 196 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Alcohol interventions for mandated college students: A meta-analytic review.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2016
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lori A J Scott-SheldonCenters for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, The Miriam Hospital.
Kate B CareyDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences, School of Public Health, Brown University.
Jennifer C ElliottDepartment of Psychology, Syracuse University.
Lorra GareyCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University.
Michael P CareyCenters for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, The Miriam Hospital.
Miriam Hospital · USBrown University · USJohn Brown University · USSyracuse University · US

Funding

Substance Abuse Epidemiology Training Program (SAETP) at Columbia UniversityT32DA031099 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DEBORAH S HASIN, Silvia Saboia Martins · 2012 to 2026
$6.1M
BRIEF INTERVENTIONS FOR BINGE DRINKING COLLEGE STUDENTSR01AA012518 · NIAAA · SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY · PI CAREY, KATE B · 2000 to 2014
$5.1M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA012518NIAAA NIH HHS R01-AA012518NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA031099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlcohol use established during the first-year of college can result in adverse consequences during the college years and beyond. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated the efficacy of interventions to prevent alcohol misuse by first-year college students.

methodStudies were included if the study reported an individual- or group-level intervention using a randomized controlled trial, targeted 1st-year college students, and assessed alcohol use. Forty-one studies with 62 separate interventions (N = 24,294; 57% women; 77% White) were included. Independent raters coded sample, design, methodological features, and intervention content. Weighted mean effect sizes, using fixed- and random-effects models, were calculated. Potential moderators, determined a priori, were examined to explain variability in effect sizes.

resultsRelative to controls, students receiving an intervention reported lower quantity and frequency of drinking and fewer problems (d(+)s = 0.07-0.14). These results were more pronounced when the interventions were compared with an assessment-only control group (d(+)s = 0.11-0.19). Intervention content (e.g., personalized feedback) moderated the efficacy of the intervention.

conclusionsBehavioral interventions for 1st-year college students reduce alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems. Interventions that include personalized feedback, moderation strategies, expectancy challenge, identification of risky situations, and goal-setting optimize efficacy. Strategies to prevent alcohol misuse among first-year students are recommended.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAlcohol-Related DisordersFemaleHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStudentsTreatment OutcomeUniversities

Identifiers

PMID24447002
PMCPMC3987817
OpenAlexW1973964532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.