ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2014
Prospective and retrospective duration memory in the hippocampus: is time in the foreground or background?
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retrospective duration judgments of naturalistic events depend on memories of event boundaries.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- Spontaneous Oscillatory Activity in Episodic Timing: An EEG Replication Study and Its Limitations.eNeuro · 2026Article
- Neural Representation of Episodic Time.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Review
- Neurocomputational Models of Interval Timing: Seeing the Forest for the Trees.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Spontaneous α Brain Dynamics Track the Episodic "When".The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Intrinsic hippocampal connectivity is associated with individual differences in retrospective duration processing.Brain structure & function · 2023Article
- Medial Entorhinal Cortex Excitatory Neurons Are Necessary for Accurate Timing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Reply to Lehr and Stöber: What's in a name? On the distinction between temporal coding and internally driven activity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Is the scalar property of interval timing preserved after hippocampus lesions?Journal of theoretical biology · 2021Article
- Activity in perceptual classification networks as a basis for human subjective time perception.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Hippocampal connectivity with sensorimotor cortex during volitional finger movements: Laterality and relationship to motor learning.PloS one · 2019Article
- The Persistence of Memory: How the Brain Encodes Time in Memory.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2017Article
- Time Perception Mechanisms at Central Nervous System.Neurology international · 2016Review
- Cognitive Aging and Time Perception: Roles of Bayesian Optimization and Degeneracy.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2016Review
- Increased Hippocampus-Medial Prefrontal Cortex Resting-State Functional Connectivity and Memory Function after Tai Chi Chuan Practice in Elder Adults.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2016Article
- Cortical and subcortical contributions to sequence retrieval: Schematic coding of temporal context in the neocortical recollection network.NeuroImage · 2015Article
- Entorhinal-hippocampal neuronal circuits bridge temporally discontiguous events.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2015Review
- Time cells in the hippocampus: a new dimension for mapping memories.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2014Review
- Comparison of interval timing behaviour in mice following dorsal or ventral hippocampal lesions with mice having δ-opioid receptor gene deletion.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Psychologists have long distinguished between prospective and retrospective timing to highlight the difference between our sense of duration during an experience in passing and our sense of duration in hindsight. Humans and other animals use prospective timing in the seconds-to-minutes range in order to learn durations, and can organize their behaviour based upon this knowledge when they know that duration information will be important ahead of time. By contrast, when durations are estimated after the fact, thus precluding the subject from consciously attending to temporal information, duration information must be extracted from other memory representations. The accumulated evidence from prospective timing research has generally led to the hippocampus (HPC) being casted in a supporting role with prefrontal-striatal, cortical or cerebellar circuits playing the lead. Here, I review findings from the animal and human literature that have led to this conclusion and consider that the contribution of the HPC to duration memory is understated because we have little understanding about how we remember duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.