Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24446358›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2014

Generative models of conformational dynamics.

Christopher James Langmead

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Peptidoglycan remodeling by the coordinated action of multispecific enzymes.Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christopher James LangmeadCarnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, cjl@cs.cmu.edu.

Funding

TrainingP41GM103712 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FAEDER, JAMES · 2012 to 2021
$16.3M
Innovative Supercomputing for Breakthrough Molecular DynamicsRC2GM093307 · NIGMS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI DITTRICH, MARKUS · 2009 to 2010
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103712NIGMS NIH HHS RC2 GM093307NIGMS NIH HHS RC2GM093307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atomistic simulations of the conformational dynamics of proteins can be performed using either Molecular Dynamics or Monte Carlo procedures. The ensembles of three-dimensional structures produced during simulation can be analyzed in a number of ways to elucidate the thermodynamic and kinetic properties of the system. The goal of this chapter is to review both traditional and emerging methods for learning generative models from atomistic simulation data. Here, the term 'generative' refers to a model of the joint probability distribution over the behaviors of the constituent atoms. In the context of molecular modeling, generative models reveal the correlation structure between the atoms, and may be used to predict how the system will respond to structural perturbations. We begin by discussing traditional methods, which produce multivariate Gaussian models. We then discuss GAMELAN (GRAPHICAL MODELS OF ENERGY LANDSCAPES), which produces generative models of complex, non-Gaussian conformational dynamics (e.g., allostery, binding, folding, etc.) from long timescale simulation data.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalMolecular Dynamics SimulationMonte Carlo MethodAllosteric RegulationAntibodies, MonoclonalCD4 AntigensHIV-1HIV Envelope Protein gp120HIV Fusion InhibitorsHomeodomain ProteinsHumansNormal DistributionProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein FoldingAntibodies, MonoclonalCD4 AntigensHIV Envelope Protein gp120HIV Fusion InhibitorsHomeodomain Proteinsibalizumab

Identifiers

PMID24446358
PMCPMC4090804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.