ArticleNeuroinformatics2014
Structure-based neuron retrieval across Drosophila brains.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large scale similarity search across digital reconstructions of neural morphology.Neuroscience research · 2022Article
- NBLAST: Rapid, Sensitive Comparison of Neuronal Structure and Construction of Neuron Family Databases.Neuron · 2016Article
- Adaptive and Background-Aware GAL4 Expression Enhancement of Co-registered Confocal Microscopy Images.Neuroinformatics · 2016Article
- BlastNeuron for Automated Comparison, Retrieval and Clustering of 3D Neuron Morphologies.Neuroinformatics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comparing local neural structures across large sets of examples is crucial when studying gene functions, and their effect in the Drosophila brain. The current practice of aligning brain volume data to a joint reference frame is based on the neuropil. However, even after alignment neurons exhibit residual location and shape variability that, together with image noise, hamper direct quantitative comparison and retrieval of similar structures on an intensity basis. In this paper, we propose and evaluate an image-based retrieval method for neurons, relying on local appearance, which can cope with spatial variability across the population. For an object of interest marked in a query case, the method ranks cases drawn from a large data set based on local neuron appearance in confocal microscopy data. The approach is based on capturing the orientation of neurons based on structure tensors and expanding this field via Gradient Vector Flow. During retrieval, the algorithm compares fields across cases, and calculates a corresponding ranking of most similar cases with regard to the local structure of interest. Experimental results demonstrate that the similarity measure and ranking mechanisms yield high precision and recall in realistic search scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24446234What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.