Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24445963›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2015

Methodology developed for the simultaneous measurement of bone formation and bone resorption in rats based on the pharmacokinetics of fluoride.

Maela Lupo, Maria Lorena Brance, Brenda Lorena Fina, Lucas Ricardo Brun, Alfredo Rigalli

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maela LupoBone Biology Laboratory, School of Medicine, Rosario National University, Santa Fe 3100, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina, maela_lupo@hotmail.com.
Maria Lorena Brance
Brenda Lorena Fina
Lucas Ricardo Brun
Alfredo Rigalli
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARNational University of Rosario · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes a novel methodology for the simultaneous estimation of bone formation (BF) and resorption (BR) in rats using fluoride as a nonradioactive bone-seeker ion. The pharmacokinetics of flouride have been extensively studied in rats; its constants have all been characterized. This knowledge was the cornerstone for the underlying mathematical model that we used to measure bone fluoride uptake and elimination rate after a dose of fluoride. Bone resorption and formation were estimated by bone fluoride uptake and elimination rate, respectively. ROC analysis showed that sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve were not different from deoxypiridinoline and bone alkaline phosphatase, well-known bone markers. Sprague-Dawley rats with modified bone remodelling (ovariectomy, hyper, and hypocalcic diet, antiresorptive treatment) were used to validate the values obtained with this methodology. The results of BF and BR obtained with this technique were as expected for each biological model. Although the method should be performed under general anesthesia, it has several advantages: simultaneous measurement of BR and BF, low cost, and the use of compounds with no expiration date.

Indexed as

Bone ResorptionOsteogenesisAlkaline PhosphataseAmino AcidsAnimalsArea Under CurveBone and BonesBone RemodelingCalciumFemaleFluoridesIonsModels, TheoreticalOvariectomyPredictive Value of TestsRatsAlkaline PhosphataseAmino AcidsCalciumdeoxypyridinolineFluoridesIons

Identifiers

PMID24445963
OpenAlexW2014185998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.