Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24445777›Full record

ArticleNature communications2014

Maspin is not required for embryonic development or tumour suppression.

Sonia S Y Teoh, Jessica Vieusseux, Monica Prakash, Susan Berkowicz, Jennii Luu, Catherina H Bird, Ruby H P Law, Carlos Rosado, John T Price, James C Whisstock and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An Essential Role ofCancer research · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Mice LackingFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sonia S Y TeohDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Jessica VieusseuxDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Monica PrakashDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Susan BerkowiczDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Jennii LuuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Catherina H BirdDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Ruby H P Law1] Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia [2] Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Structural and Functional Microbial Genomics, School of Biomedical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Carlos Rosado1] Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia [2] Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Structural and Functional Microbial Genomics, School of Biomedical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia.
John T PriceDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia.
James C Whisstock1] Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia [2] Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Structural and Functional Microbial Genomics, School of Biomedical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Phillip I BirdDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Monash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maspin (SERPINB5) is accepted as an important tumour suppressor lost in many cancers. Consistent with a critical role in development or differentiation maspin knockout mice die during early embryogenesis, yet clinical data conflict on the prognostic utility of maspin expression. Here to reconcile these findings we made conditional knockout mice. Surprisingly, maspin knockout embryos develop into overtly normal animals. Contrary to original reports, maspin re-expression does not inhibit tumour growth or metastasis in vivo, or influence cell migration, invasion or survival in vitro. Bioinformatic analyses reveal that maspin is not commonly under-expressed in cancer, and that perturbation of genes near maspin may in fact explain poor survival in certain patient cohorts with low maspin expression.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorEmbryonic DevelopmentHumansMiceMice, KnockoutNeoplasmsSerpinsSERPIN-B5Serpins

Identifiers

PMID24445777
PMCPMC3905777
OpenAlexW1968311331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.