Trial reportCancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)
A single-arm, open-label, expanded access study of vemurafenib in patients with metastatic melanoma in the United States.
Trial report in Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Incidence, Diagnosis, and Management of QT Prolongation Induced by Cancer Therapies: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017Pooled it
- New Standards in the Treatment of Advanced Metastatic Melanoma: Immunotherapy and BRAF-Targeted Therapies as Emerging Paradigms.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Review
- Review
- Augmenting Treatment Arms With External Data Through Propensity-Score Weighted Power Priors: An Application in Expanded Access.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Off-targets of BRAF inhibitors disrupt endothelial signaling and vascular barrier function.Life science alliance · 2024Article
- Cardiac Arrhythmias in Oncological Patients-Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Management within the Context of the New ESC 2022 Guidelines.Current oncology reports · 2023Review
- Article
- Preliminary analysis of distinct clinical and biologic features of bone metastases in melanoma.Melanoma research · 2020Article
- Using personalized medicine in gliomas: a genomic approach to diagnosis and overcoming treatment resistance in a case with pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma.Journal of neurology · 2020Article
- [Cardiac arrhythmias in oncological diseases, during radiotherapy, chemotherapy].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2019Review
- QT Interval Prolongation Associated With Cytotoxic and Targeted Cancer Therapeutics.Current treatment options in oncology · 2019Review
- Tolerability of BRAF/MEK inhibitor combinations: adverse event evaluation and management.ESMO open · 2019Review
- Primary and Metastatic Melanoma With NTRK Fusions.The American journal of surgical pathology · 2018Article
- Anticancer drugs-related QTc prolongation, torsade de pointes and sudden death: current evidence and future research perspectives.Oncotarget · 2018Review
- Electrophysiologic Toxicity of Chemoradiation.Current oncology reports · 2018Review
- Cardiovascular Complications of Cancer Therapy: Best Practices in Diagnosis, Prevention, and Management: Part 2.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2017Review
- Overcoming resistance to single-agent therapy for oncogenicOncotarget · 2017Article
- Article
- Primary and Metastatic Cutaneous Melanomas Express ALK Through Alternative Transcriptional Initiation.The American journal of surgical pathology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis open-label, multicenter study was designed to allow access to vemurafenib for patients with metastatic melanoma, bridging the time between end of enrollment in the phase III registration trial (December 2010) and commercial availability following US Food and Drug Administration approval of vemurafenib for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic BRAF-mutated melanoma (August 2011). PATIENTS AND
methodsEligible patients had metastatic melanoma with a BRAF mutation (detected by the cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test). Unlike previous vemurafenib trials, patients with poor performance status (PS) and treated brain metastases were permitted. Enrolled patients received oral vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily.
resultsOf 374 patients enrolled at 29 US sites (December 2010 to October 2011), 371 patients received vemurafenib and were followed up for a median of 2.8 months (the study had a prespecified end upon vemurafenib approval and commercial availability). At baseline, most patients (75%) had stage M1c disease, and 19% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS of 2 or 3; 72% of patients had received prior systemic therapy for metastatic melanoma, 27% received prior ipilimumab, and 29% radiotherapy for prior brain metastases. Because reassessment data to confirm response were not available for most patients, point estimates of objective response rate (ORR) are reported. Among 241 efficacy-evaluable patients, the ORR was 54% (median time to response, 1.9 months). The ORR in non-central nervous system sites in patients with previously treated brain metastases (n = 68) was 53%. The ORR in prior ipilimumab-treated patients (n = 68) was 52%. For patients with PS of 0 or 1 (n = 210) and 2 or 3 (n = 31), the ORRs were 55%, and 42%, respectively. The safety profile observed was consistent with that reported in previous studies. The number of patients with grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was higher in patients with PS 2 or 3 than in those with PS 0 or 1 (10% vs. 5%, respectively). Adverse events requiring a dose reduction (at least 1 level) occurred in 11% of patients, and 9 patients (2%) experienced events leading to vemurafenib withdrawal, including 2 with repeated QT interval prolongation. DISCUSSION: This study confirmed the established rapid and high tumor response rate achievable with vemurafenib in BRAF mutation-positive metastatic melanoma. Several groups not included in previous studies, including patients with previously treated brain metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS 2 to 3, or previous ipilimumab treatment had benefitted from vemurafenib similar to the overall population. No new safety signals were detected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.