ReviewCurrent oncology reports2014
Endoscopic resection of sinonasal cancers.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- A case of high-grade non-intestinal paranasal sinus adenocarcinoma primary in the maxillary sinus: targeted therapy after postoperative immunocombination with chemotherapy.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Signaling Pathways mTOR and ERK as Therapeutic Targets in Sinonasal Intestinal-Type Adenocarcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Different Approaches in Skull Base Surgery Carry Risks for Different Types of Complications.Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement · 2023Article
- Molecular Basis and Rationale for the Use of Targeted Agents and Immunotherapy in Sinonasal Cancers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Dual-energy CT in differentiating benign sinonasal lesions from malignant ones: comparison with simulated single-energy CT, conventional MRI, and DWI.European radiology · 2022Article
- Clinical outcomes, Kadish-INSICA staging and therapeutic targeting of somatostatin receptor 2 in olfactory neuroblastoma.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2022Article
- Surgical outcomes of endoscopic versus open resection for the management of sinonasal malignancies.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2020Review
- Management of squamous cell carcinomas of the skull-base.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2020Review
- Standard diffusion-weighted, diffusion kurtosis and intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging of sinonasal malignancies: correlations with Ki-67 proliferation status.European radiology · 2018Article
- Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MR Imaging in the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Sinonasal Lesions: Comparison with Conventional Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2018Article
- Olfactory Neuroblastoma.Current oncology reports · 2018Review
- Minimally invasive endoscopic resection for the treatment of sinonasal malignancy: the outcomes and risk factors for recurrence.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2017Article
- Skull Base Surgery Training and Practice Patterns among Recent Otolaryngology Fellowship Graduates.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2016Article
- Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for sinonasal tumors: a single center long-term clinical analysis.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2016Article
- Sinonasal carcinoma: clinical, pathological, genetic and therapeutic advances.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2014Review
- Epidemiological Features of Sinonasal Adenocarcinoma and Prognostic Nomogram: A Study Based on the SEER Database.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sinonasal malignancies, a rare group of tumors, are characterized by histological heterogeneity and poor survival. As improvements in image-guidance and endoscopic technologies became incorporated into head and neck oncologic and neurosurgical practice, the application of these technologies and techniques to the surgical management of sinonasal malignancy began. Over the past decade, there has been increasing evidence regarding the safety and oncological effectiveness of these techniques. Several institutions have reported their experience with endoscopic surgery and have shown reduced morbidity, better quality of life, and survival outcomes equivalent to those of open surgery in carefully selected patients. Endoscopic cranial base surgery is a rapidly evolving field. We review the literature on oncological outcomes, safety, quality of life, and recent technological advances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24445501What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.