ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2014
Renal artery stenosis in children: therapeutic percutaneous balloon and stent angioplasty.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Severe arterial hypertension, a silent complication of Williams-Beuren syndrome: A case report with literature review.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Diagnosis and Endovascular Management of Transplant Renal Artery Stenosis: A Retrospective Two-Decade Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Presentation, treatment, and outcome of renovascular hypertension below 2 years of age.European journal of pediatrics · 2022Article
- Two cases of children presenting with polydipsia, polyuria, and malignant hypertension: Answers.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2022Article
- Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of CT angiography for renal artery stenosis in children.Pediatric radiology · 2021Article
- Renovascular hypertension in children.CVIR endovascular · 2021Review
- Efficacy of Antihypertensive Therapy in a Child with Unilateral Focal Fibromuscular Dysplasia of the Renal Artery: A Case Study and Review of Literature.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRenal artery stenosis (RAS) accounts for 10 % of cases of systemic hypertension in children. Initial management involves anti-hypertensive therapy. Percutaneous interventions are documented for the treatment of RAS in the adult population. In children, case reports suggest benefit.
methodsThis is a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients referred for catheterization for RAS between 2002 and 2010 at a single institution. Recorded variables included: age, weight, systemic blood pressure, minimal luminal diameter, interventional devices, antihypertensive medications, contrast volume, and complications.
resultsTwelve patients (median age 8.2, IQR 6-12.4 years); median weight 42.8 kg, IQR: 25-47.4 kg) were referred for renal artery catheterization and underwent percutaneous intervention. Overall, minimal luminal diameter (MLD) increased by 1.2 ± 0.9 mm for all patients (p < 0.05) and by 1.3 ± 0.9 mm for post-renal transplant patients (p < 0.05). Only stent angioplasty patients demonstrated significant improved blood pressure (p < 0.05). One patient had stent thrombosis requiring re-intervention with repeat balloon angioplasty.
conclusionsThis retrospective analysis suggests that percutaneous intervention might play a role in the management of RAS, with an improvement in MLD in children with RAS. Transcatheter intervention is technically feasible with low morbidity. A prospective, longitudinal study is warranted to compare standard medical therapy with percutaneous interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.