ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2014
Modeling protein assemblies in the proteome.
Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pioneer in Molecular Biology: Conformational Ensembles in Molecular Recognition, Allostery, and Cell Function.Journal of molecular biology · 2025Review
- CombFold: predicting structures of large protein assemblies using a combinatorial assembly algorithm and AlphaFold2.Nature methods · 2024Article
- Predicting structures of large protein assemblies using combinatorial assembly algorithm and AlphaFold2.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Modeling the Dynamics of Protein-Protein Interfaces, How and Why?Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- PRISM-EM: template interface-based modelling of multi-protein complexes guided by cryo-electron microscopy density maps.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2016Article
- The potential impact of recent developments in three-dimensional quantitative interaction proteomics on structural biology.Expert review of proteomics · 2016Article
- OncoBinder facilitates interpretation of proteomic interaction data by capturing coactivation pairs in cancer.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- Large oligomeric complex structures can be computationally assembled by efficiently combining docked interfaces.Proteins · 2015Article
- The structural basis for cancer treatment decisions.Oncotarget · 2014Review
- ProBiS-ligands: a web server for prediction of ligands by examination of protein binding sites.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Structural pathways of cytokines may illuminate their roles in regulation of cancer development and immunotherapy.Cancers · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most (if not all) proteins function when associated in multimolecular assemblies. Attaining the structures of protein assemblies at the atomic scale is an important aim of structural biology. Experimentally, structures are increasingly available, and computations can help bridge the resolution gap between high- and low-resolution scales. Existing computational methods have made substantial progress toward this aim; however, current approaches are still limited. Some involve manual adjustment of experimental data; some are automated docking methods, which are computationally expensive and not applicable to large-scale proteome studies; and still others exploit the symmetry of the complexes and thus are not applicable to nonsymmetrical complexes. Our study aims to take steps toward overcoming these limitations. We have developed a strategy for the construction of protein assemblies computationally based on binary interactions predicted by a motif-based protein interaction prediction tool, PRISM (Protein Interactions by Structural Matching). Previously, we have shown its power in predicting pairwise interactions. Here we take a step toward multimolecular assemblies, reflecting the more prevalent cellular scenarios. With this method we are able to construct homo-/hetero-complexes and symmetric/asymmetric complexes without a limitation on the number of components. The method considers conformational changes and is applicable to large-scale studies. We also exploit electron microscopy density maps to select a solution from among the predictions. Here we present the method, illustrate its results, and highlight its current limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.