Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24445287›Full record

ArticleUrologic oncology2014

"Use it or lose it" as an alternative approach to protect genetic privacy in personalized medicine.

Jennifer K Wagner, Jessica T Mozersky, Reed E Pyeritz

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urologic oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Is there a duty to recontact in light of new genetic technologies? A systematic review of the literature.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer K WagnerCenter for the Integration of Genetic Healthcare Technologies (CIGHT), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Jessica T MozerskyCenter for the Integration of Genetic Healthcare Technologies (CIGHT), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Reed E PyeritzCenter for the Integration of Genetic Healthcare Technologies (CIGHT), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: reed.pyeritz@uphs.upenn.edu.

Funding

Applying Genomic Sequencing in PediatricsU01HG006546 · NHGRI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI KRANTZ, IAN D. · 2012 to 2016
$10.6M
Penn Center for ELSI Research in Emerging Genetic Technologies in Health CareP50HG004487 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PYERITZ, REED E · 2007 to 2012
$6.2M
Multidisciplinary Study of Race Appearance Ancestry Discrimination & PrejudiceK99HG006446 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WAGNER, JENNIFER KRISTIN · 2012 to 2013
$180k
NHGRI NIH HHS K99 HG006446NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG004487NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ConfidentialityDisclosureGenetic PrivacyGenomicsHumansPrecision MedicineSequence Analysis, DNAELSIGenetic informationPrecision medicinePrivacyWhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID24445287
PMCPMC3970576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.