Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24445258›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2014

Neuroprotective strategies for traumatic brain injury: improving clinical translation.

Shruti V Kabadi, Alan I Faden

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02362347 (Investigating Novel Treatments for Concussion), which is not on this map. Cited by 104 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02362347 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Investigating Novel Treatments for Concussion: Impact of Compression Vest on Rehabilitation Outcomes

TypeinterventionalSponsorWestern University, CanadaRan2015 to 2019Enrolled153ConditionsBrain Concussion, Post-Concussion SyndromeArmsLondon Health Sciences Centre - Compression Vest, exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Research progress on biomarkers of traumatic brain injury.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. BDNF: New Views of an Old Player in Traumatic Brain Injury.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy as the Course of Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shruti V KabadiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Center for Shock, Trauma and Anesthesiology Research (STAR), National Study Center for Trauma and EMS, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. skabadi@anes.umm.edu.
Alan I FadenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Center for Shock, Trauma and Anesthesiology Research (STAR), National Study Center for Trauma and EMS, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. afaden@anes.umm.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) induces secondary biochemical changes that contribute to delayed neuroinflammation, neuronal cell death, and neurological dysfunction. Attenuating such secondary injury has provided the conceptual basis for neuroprotective treatments. Despite strong experimental data, more than 30 clinical trials of neuroprotection in TBI patients have failed. In part, these failures likely reflect methodological differences between the clinical and animal studies, as well as inadequate pre-clinical evaluation and/or trial design problems. However, recent changes in experimental approach and advances in clinical trial methodology have raised the potential for successful clinical translation. Here we critically analyze the current limitations and translational opportunities for developing successful neuroprotective therapies for TBI.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain InjuriesClinical Trials as TopicHumansNeuroprotective AgentsTranslational Research, BiomedicalNeuroprotective Agents

Identifiers

PMID24445258
PMCPMC3907865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.