Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24444537›Full record

Trial reportThe Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences2014

Oral etoposide and oral prednisone for the treatment of castration resistant prostate cancer.

Yi-Ping Zhu, Xu-Dong Yao, Shi-Lin Zhang, Bo Dai, Hai-Liang Zhang, Yi-Jun Shen, Yao Zhu, Guo-Hai Shi, Guo-Wen Lin, Ding-Wei Ye

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yi-Ping ZhuDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xu-Dong YaoDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shi-Lin ZhangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Bo DaiDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hai-Liang ZhangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yi-Jun ShenDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yao ZhuDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Guo-Hai ShiDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Guo-Wen LinDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ding-Wei YeDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: dwyeli@163.com.
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment options for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) are limited. The purpose of our study was to investigate the safety and efficacy in terms of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response of a low-dose oral combination of etoposide and prednisone in patients with CRPC. Thirty-nine patients with prostate cancer (median age, 77.9 years) with progressive disease after standard hormonal therapy were enrolled. Etoposide (25 mg, twice daily) and prednisone (5 mg, twice daily) were administered orally. Each cycle comprised 21 consecutive days of treatment followed by a 7-day drug holiday. All patients previously treated with an antiandrogen were required to undergo antiandrogen withdrawal prior to entry into the study. A total of 226 cycles were administered with a median of 6.7 cycles per patient (range, 1-18 cycles). Sixteen of 39 patients (41%) with elevated PSA levels at baseline achieved at least a 50% reduction in PSA levels. Median progression-free survival for all patients was 5.9 months (range, 1-17 months). No Grade 4 toxicities were observed. The predominant toxicities were mucositis, nausea, fatigue, and anemia in twelve, nine, eight, and seven patients, respectively. Hematologic toxicity was infrequent, with no episodes of febrile neutropenia. The combination of low-dose etoposide and prednisone is an efficacious and reasonably well-tolerated oral regimen in the treatment of elderly patients with CRPC. This regimen can be easily administered in an outpatient setting and does not require frequent patient visits.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicEtoposideHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrednisoneProstatic NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicEtoposidePrednisoneCastration-resistant prostate cancerChemotherapyEtoposideOral

Identifiers

PMID24444537
PMCPMC11916554
OpenAlexW2086310284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.