Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24444476›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology2014

Focal therapy in prostate cancer: international multidisciplinary consensus on trial design.

Willemien van den Bos, Berrend G Muller, Hashim Ahmed, Chris H Bangma, Eric Barret, Sebastien Crouzet, Scott E Eggener, Inderbir S Gill, Steven Joniau, Gyoergy Kovacs and 6 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Surveillance after Focal Therapy - a Comprehensive Review.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Willemien van den BosDepartment of Urology, AMC University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: w.vandenbos@amc.uva.nl.
Berrend G MullerDepartment of Urology, AMC University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hashim AhmedDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK.
Chris H BangmaDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eric BarretDepartment of Urology, Institut Montsouris, Paris, France.
Sebastien CrouzetHospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.
Scott E EggenerDepartment of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Inderbir S GillInstitute of Urology, Hillard and Roclyn Herzog Center for Prostate Cancer Focal Therapy, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Steven JoniauDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.
Gyoergy KovacsInterdisciplinary Brachytherapy Unit, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Sascha PahernikDepartment of Urology, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jean J de la RosetteDepartment of Urology, AMC University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Olivier RouvièreHospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Radiology, Hôpital E. Herriot, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Georg SalomonDepartment of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
John F WardDepartment of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Peter T ScardinoDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701302Medical Research Council G1002509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFocal therapy has been introduced for the treatment of localised prostate cancer (PCa). To provide the necessary data for consistent assessment, all focal therapy trials should be performed according to uniform, systematic pre- and post-treatment evaluation with well-defined end points and strict inclusion and exclusion criteria.

objectiveTo obtain consensus on trial design for focal therapy in PCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsA four-staged consensus project based on a modified Delphi process was conducted in which 48 experts in focal therapy of PCa participated. According to this formal consensus-building method, participants were asked to fill out an iterative sequence of questionnaires to collect data on trial design. Subsequently, a consensus meeting was held in which 13 panellists discussed acquired data, clarified the results, and defined the conclusions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A multidisciplinary board from oncologic centres worldwide reached consensus on patient selection, pretreatment assessment, evaluation of outcome, and follow-up. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Inclusion criteria for candidates in focal therapy trials are patients with prostate-specific antigen <15 ng/ml, clinical stage T1c-T2a, Gleason score 3+3 or 3+4, life expectancy of >10 yr, and any prostate volume. The optimal biopsy strategy includes transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies to be taken between 6 mo and 12 mo after treatment. The primary objective should be focal ablation of clinically significant disease with negative biopsies at 12 mo after treatment as the primary end point.

conclusionsThis consensus report provides a standard for designing a feasible focal therapy trial. PATIENT SUMMARY: A variety of ablative technologies have been introduced and applied in a focal manner for the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). In this consensus report, an international panel of experts in the field of PCa determined pre- and post-treatment work-up for focal therapy research.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionCatheter AblationClinical Trials as TopicConsensusCryosurgeryDelphi TechniqueElectroporationEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationHumansLaser TherapyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotochemotherapyProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsProstate-Specific AntigenFocal therapyProstate cancerTrial design

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.