Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24444404›Full record

ArticlePharmacogenomics2014

Genome-wide association and pharmacological profiling of 29 anticancer agents using lymphoblastoid cell lines.

Chad C Brown, Tammy M Havener, Marisa W Medina, John R Jack, Ronald M Krauss, Howard L McLeod, Alison A Motsinger-Reif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacogenomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Beyond ICJournal of pharmacogenomics & pharmacoproteomics · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chad C BrownBioinformatics Research Center, Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA.
Tammy M Havener
Marisa W Medina
John R Jack
Ronald M Krauss
Howard L McLeod
Alison A Motsinger-Reif
North Carolina State University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Genetic Etiology of Cancer Drug ResponseR01CA161608 · NCI · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI WILTSHIRE, TIM, WRIGHT, FRED A. · 2012 to 2021
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA161608NCI NIH HHS R01CA161608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimAssociation mapping with lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) is a promising approach in pharmacogenomics research, and in the current study we utilized LCLs to perform association mapping for 29 chemotherapy drugs. MATERIALS &

methodsCurrently, we use LCLs to perform genome-wide association mapping of the cytotoxic response of 520 European-Americans to 29 different anticancer drugs; the largest LCL study to date. A novel association approach using a multivariate analysis of covariance design was employed with the software program MAGWAS, testing for differences in the dose-response profiles between genotypes without making assumptions about the response curve or the biologic mode of association. Additionally, by classifying 25 of the 29 drugs into eight families according to structural and mechanistic relationships, MAGWAS was used to test for associations that were shared across each drug family. Finally, a unique algorithm using multivariate responses and multiple linear regressions across pairs of response curves was used for unsupervised clustering of drugs.

resultsAmong the single-drug studies, suggestive associations were obtained for 18 loci, 12 within/near genes. Three of these, MED12L, CHN2 and MGMT, have been previously implicated in cancer pharmacogenomics. The drug family associations resulted in four additional suggestive loci (three contained within/near genes). One of these genes, HDAC4, associated with the DNA alkylating agents, shows possible clinical interactions with temozolomide. For the drug clustering analysis, 18 of 25 drugs clustered into the appropriate family.

conclusionThis study demonstrates the utility of LCLs in identifying genes that have clinical importance in drug response and for assigning unclassified agents to specific drug families, and proposes new candidate genes for follow-up in a large number of chemotherapy drugs.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenome-Wide Association StudyAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, PharmacologicalCell Line, TumorGenotypeHistone DeacetylasesHumansPharmacogeneticsRepressor ProteinsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, PharmacologicalHDAC4 protein, humanHistone DeacetylasesRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24444404
PMCPMC4055088
OpenAlexW2096948364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.