Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24444024›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2014

PaTz groups for primary palliative care: reinventing cooperation between general practitioners and district nurses in palliative care: an evaluation study combining data from focus groups and a questionnaire.

Annicka G M van der Plas, Martijn Hagens, H Roeline W Pasman, Bart Schweitzer, Marij Duijsters, Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Supporting GPs around euthanasia requests from people with dementia: a qualitative analysis of Dutch nominal group meetings.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Improving palliative care provision in primary care: a pre- and post-survey evaluation among PaTz groups.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparison of end-of-life care for older people living at home and in residential homes: a mortality follow-back study among GPs in the Netherlands.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annicka G M van der PlasVU University medical centre, Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO + Institute for Health and Care Research, Centre of Expertise in Palliative Care, P,O, Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. eol@vumc.nl.
Martijn Hagens
H Roeline W Pasman
Bart Schweitzer
Marij Duijsters
Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPaTz (an acronym for 'PAlliatieve Thuis Zorg'; palliative care at home) is an intervention to improve palliative care provision and strengthen the generalist knowledge of palliative care. In PaTz general practitioners and district nurses meet on a regular basis to identify patients with palliative care needs and to discuss care for these patients. This study explores experiences with regard to collaboration between general practitioners and district nurses, and perceived benefits of and barriers for implementation of PaTz.

methodsThis study is conducted within the primary care setting. Participants were 24 general practitioners who filled in a questionnaire, and seven general practitioners, five district nurses and two palliative care consultants who attended one of two focus groups.

resultsPaTz led to improved collaboration. Participants felt informational and emotional support from other PaTz participants. Also they felt that continuity of care was enhanced by PaTz. Practical recommendations for implementation were: meetings every 6 to 8 weeks, regular attendance from both general practitioners and district nurses, presence of a palliative care consultant, and a strong chairman.

conclusionsPaTz is successful in enhancing collaboration in primary palliative care and easy to implement. Participants felt it improved continuity of care and knowledge on palliative care. Further research is needed to investigate whether patient and carer outcomes improve.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsGeneral PracticeHome Care ServicesInterprofessional RelationsNursingPalliative CarePatient Care TeamFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID24444024
PMCPMC3907127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.