Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24443730›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology practice2014

Where do patients with cancer in Iowa receive radiation therapy?

Marcia M Ward, Fred Ullrich, Kevin Matthews, Gerard Rushton, Roger Tracy, Michael A Goldstein, Dean F Bajorin, Michael P Kosty, Suanna S Bruinooge, Amy Hanley and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology practice, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Differences in Travel Time to Cancer Surgery for Colon versus Rectal Cancer in a Rural State: A New Method for Analyzing Time-to-Place Data Using Survival Analysis.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Enhancing Career Paths for Tomorrow's Radiation Oncologists.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Identifying Determinants for Traveled Distance and Bypassing in Outpatient Care: A Scoping Review.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marcia M WardUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; and West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV.
Fred Ullrich
Kevin Matthews
Gerard Rushton
Roger Tracy
Michael A Goldstein
Dean F Bajorin
Michael P Kosty
Suanna S Bruinooge
Amy Hanley
Geraldine M Jacobson
Charles F Lynch

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Mark E Burkard · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000032C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMultiple studies have shown survival benefits in patients with cancer treated with radiation therapy, but access to treatment facilities has been found to limit its use. This study was undertaken to examine access issues in Iowa and determine a methodology for conducting a similar national analysis. PATIENTS AND

methodsAll Iowa residents who received radiation therapy regardless of where they were diagnosed or treated were identified through the Iowa Cancer Registry (ICR). Radiation oncologists were identified through the Iowa Physician Information System (IPIS). Radiation facilities were identified through IPIS and classified using the Commission on Cancer accreditation standard.

resultsBetween 2004 and 2010, 113,885 invasive cancers in 106,603 patients, 28.5% of whom received radiation treatment, were entered in ICR. Mean and median travel times were 25.8 and 20.1 minutes, respectively, to the nearest facility but 42.4 and 29.1 minutes, respectively, to the patient's chosen treatment facility. Multivariable analysis predicting travel time showed significant relationships for disease site, age, residence location, and facility category. Residents of small and isolated rural towns traveled nearly 3× longer than urban residents to receive radiation therapy, as did patients using certain categories of facilities.

conclusionHalf of Iowa patients could reach their nearest facility in 20 minutes, but instead, they traveled 30 minutes on average to receive treatment. The findings identified certain groups of patients with cancer who chose more distant facilities. However, other groups of patients with cancer, namely those residing in rural areas, had less choice, and some had to travel considerably farther to radiation facilities than urban patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAutomobilesCancer Care FacilitiesFemaleGeographyHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIowaMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsRegistriesRural PopulationSEER Program

Identifiers

PMID24443730
PMCPMC5706138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.