Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24443622›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of industrial ergonomics2013

Pilot task-based assessment of noise levels among firefighters.

Rl Neitzel, O Hong, P Quinlan, R Hulea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of industrial ergonomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exploring First Responders' Use and Perceptions on Continuous Health and Environmental Monitoring.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  2. Prevalence of Hearing Loss and Perceptions of Hearing Health and Protection among Florida Firefighters.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rl NeitzelRisk Science Center and Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI 48109.
O HongDepartment of Community Health Systems, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143.
P QuinlanDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143.
R HuleaOffice of Regulatory Affairs, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI 48109.

Funding

Translation and Dissemination CoreP30NR009000 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SAMPSELLE, CAROLYN M · 2005 to 2009
$2.1M
NINR NIH HHS P30 NR009000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOver one million American firefighters are routinely exposed to various occupational hazards agents. While efforts have been made to identify and reduce some causes of injuries and illnesses among firefighters, relatively little has been done to evaluate and understand occupational noise exposures in this group. The purpose of this pilot study was to apply a task-based noise exposure assessment methodology to firefighting operations to evaluate potential noise exposure sources, and to use collected task-based noise levels to create noise exposure estimates for evaluation of risk of noise-induced hearing loss by comparison to the 8-hr and 24-hr recommended exposure limits (RELs) for noise of 85 and 80.3 dBA, respectively.

methodsTask-based noise exposures (n=100 measurements) were measured in three different fire departments (a rural department in Southeast Michigan and suburban and urban departments in Northern California). These levels were then combined with time-at-task information collected from firefighters to estimate 8-hr noise exposures for the rural and suburban fire departments (n=6 estimates for each department). Data from 24-hr dosimetry measurements and crude self-reported activity categories from the urban fire department (n=4 measurements) were used to create 24-hr exposure estimates to evaluate the bias associated with the task-based estimates.

resultsTask-based noise levels were found to range from 82-109 dBA, with the highest levels resulting from use of saws and pneumatic chisels. Some short (e.g., 30 min) sequences of common tasks were found to result in nearly an entire allowable daily exposure. The majority of estimated 8-hr and 24-hr exposures exceeded the relevant recommended exposure limit. Predicted 24-hr exposures showed substantial imprecision in some cases, suggesting the need for increased task specificity.

conclusionsThe results indicate potential for overexposure to noise from a variety of firefighting tasks and equipment, and suggest a need for further exposure characterization and additional hearing loss prevention efforts. RELEVANCE TO INDUSTRY: Firefighters may be at risk of noise-induced hearing loss, which can affect their fitness for duty and ability to respond effectively to emergencies. The results of this study suggest that additional efforts at hearing loss prevention among firefighters are warranted.

Indexed as

emergency responseexposurefirefighterhearing lossNoisetask-based assessment

Identifiers

PMID24443622
PMCPMC3891787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.