Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24443546›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2014

Clinical outcomes among persons with pulmonary tuberculosis caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates with phenotypic heterogeneity in results of drug-susceptibility tests.

Nicola M Zetola, Chawangwa Modongo, Patrick K Moonan, Ronald Ncube, Keikantse Matlhagela, Enoch Sepako, Ronald G Collman, Gregory P Bisson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Mixed infections and heteroresistance ofEmerging microbes & infections · 2025
    Article
  4. Identification and quantification ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Tuberculosis research and treatment · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicola M ZetolaDivision of Infectious Diseases.
Chawangwa Modongo
Patrick K Moonan
Ronald Ncube
Keikantse Matlhagela
Enoch Sepako
Ronald G Collman
Gregory P Bisson
Office of Infectious Diseases · USUniversity of Botswana · BWCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Virus & Reservoirs CoreP30AI045008 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ROBERT GROSS · 1999 to 2026
$78.6M
Dynamics of TB and MDR TB transmission in areas with high HIV prevalenceR01AI097045 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ZETOLA, NICOLA MARIO · 2011 to 2015
$2.9M
Determination of Exhaled Biomarkers for Low-Cost Diagnosis and Monitoring of TBR21AI105611 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ZETOLA, NICOLA MARIO · 2014 to 2015
$340k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI045008NIAID NIH HHS P30AI45008NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI097045NIAID NIH HHS R01AI097045NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI105611
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis may have phenotypic heterogeneity in results of drug-susceptibility tests (DSTs). However, the impact of this on clinical outcomes among patients treated for MDR tuberculosis is unknown.

methodsPhenotypic DST heterogeneity was defined as presence of at least 1 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolate susceptible to rifampicin and isoniazid recovered <3 months after MDR tuberculosis treatment initiation from a patient with previous documented tuberculosis due to M. tuberculosis resistant to at least rifampicin and isoniazid. The primary outcome was defined as good (ie, cure or treatment completion) or poor (ie, treatment failure, treatment default, or death). A secondary outcome was time to culture conversion. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the association between phenotypic DST heterogeneity and outcomes.

resultsPhenotypic DST heterogeneity was identified in 33 of 475 patients (7%) with MDR tuberculosis. Poor outcome occurred in 126 patients (28%). Overall, patients with MDR tuberculosis who had phenotypic DST heterogeneity were at greater risk of poor outcome than those with MDR tuberculosis but no phenotypic DST heterogeneity (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.6). Among HIV-infected patients with MDR tuberculosis, the adjusted hazard for a poor outcome for those with phenotypic DST heterogeneity was 2.4 (95% CI, 1.3-4.2) times that for those without phenotypic DST heterogeneity, whereas among HIV-negative patients with MDR tuberculosis, the adjusted hazard for those with phenotypic DST heterogeneity was 1.5 (95% CI, .5-4.3) times that for those without phenotypic DST heterogeneity. HIV-infected patients with MDR tuberculosis with phenotypic DST heterogeneity also had a longer time to culture conversion than with HIV-infected patients with MDR tuberculosis without phenotypic DST heterogeneity (aHR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.4-6.0).

conclusionsPhenotypic DST heterogeneity among persons with HIV infection who are being treated for MDR tuberculosis is associated with poor outcomes and longer times to culture conversion.

Indexed as

AdultAntitubercular AgentsBotswanaCohort StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMycobacterium tuberculosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantTuberculosis, PulmonaryYoung AdultAntitubercular Agentsdrug susceptibility testingmixed infection, heteroresistancemultidrug-resistant tuberculosistreatment outcomeTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID24443546
PMCPMC4017367
OpenAlexW2106761720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.