Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24443534›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2014

RecD2 helicase limits replication fork stress in Bacillus subtilis.

Brian W Walsh, Samantha A Bolz, Sarah R Wessel, Jeremy W Schroeder, James L Keck, Lyle A Simmons

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The RecD2 helicase balances RecA activities.Nucleic acids research · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brian W WalshDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Samantha A Bolz
Sarah R Wessel
Jeremy W Schroeder
James L Keck
Lyle A Simmons
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

GRADUATE TRAINING IN MOLECULAR BIOSCIENCEST32GM007215 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HULL, CHRISTINA M · 1985 to 2018
$22.5M
PREDOCTORAL TRAINING IN GENETICST32GM007544 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MORAN, JOHN V. · 1985 to 2022
$11.3M
Structure and Function of the Bacterial PrimosomeR01GM098885 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI James L Keck · 2012 to 2026
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM07215NIGMS NIH HHS GM098885NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098885NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007215NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA helicases have important roles in genome maintenance. The RecD helicase has been well studied as a component of the heterotrimeric RecBCD helicase-nuclease enzyme important for double-strand break repair in Escherichia coli. Interestingly, many bacteria lack RecBC and instead contain a RecD2 helicase, which is not known to function as part of a larger complex. Depending on the organism studied, RecD2 has been shown to provide resistance to a broad range of DNA-damaging agents while also contributing to mismatch repair (MMR). Here we investigated the importance of Bacillus subtilis RecD2 helicase to genome integrity. We show that deletion of recD2 confers a modest increase in the spontaneous mutation rate and that the mutational signature in ΔrecD2 cells is not consistent with an MMR defect, indicating a new function for RecD2 in B. subtilis. To further characterize the role of RecD2, we tested the deletion strain for sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. We found that loss of RecD2 in B. subtilis sensitized cells to several DNA-damaging agents that can block or impair replication fork movement. Measurement of replication fork progression in vivo showed that forks collapse more frequently in ΔrecD2 cells, supporting the hypothesis that RecD2 is important for normal replication fork progression. Biochemical characterization of B. subtilis RecD2 showed that it is a 5'-3' helicase and that it directly binds single-stranded DNA binding protein. Together, our results highlight novel roles for RecD2 in DNA replication which help to maintain replication fork integrity during normal growth and when forks encounter DNA damage.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationBacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsBase SequenceDNA DamageDNA HelicasesMicrobial ViabilityMolecular Sequence DataMutationBacterial ProteinsDNA Helicases

Identifiers

PMID24443534
PMCPMC3993351
OpenAlexW2128291093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.