ArticleMolecular biology reports2014
Characterization of CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 polymorphisms in South Brazilians.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic structure of pharmacogenetic biomarkers in Brazil inferred from a systematic review and population-based cohorts: a RIBEF/EPIGEN-Brazil initiative.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2018Pooled it
- Variants *1, *2, *3 and *17 of CYP2C19 Cytochrome among Helicobacter Pylori Carriers from Manaus, Amazonas State, Brazil.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021Article
- Genotype and Allele Frequency ofTurkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2018Article
- Interethnic variation of CYP2C19 alleles, 'predicted' phenotypes and 'measured' metabolic phenotypes across world populations.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2016Review
- Herbal medicines in Brazil: pharmacokinetic profile and potential herb-drug interactions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Potential causes of variability in drug response include intrinsic factors such as ethnicity and genetic differences in the expression of enzymes that metabolize drugs, such as those from Cytochrome P450 (CYPs) superfamily. Pharmacogenetic studies search for genetic differences between populations since relevant alleles occur with varying frequencies among different ethnic populations. The Brazilian population is one of the most heterogeneous in the world, resulting from multiethnic admixture of Amerindians, Europeans, and Africans across centuries. Since the knowledge of CYP allele frequency distributions is relevant to pharmacogenetic strategies and these data are scarce in the Brazilian population, this study aimed to describe genotype and allele distributions of 15 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at CYP 1A2, 2C19, 3A4, and 3A5 genes in African and European descents from South Brazil. A sample of 179 healthy individuals of European and African ancestry was genotyped by the MassARRAY SNP genotyping system. CYP3A5*3, CYP1A2*1F, CYP3A4*1B, and CYP2C19*2 were the most frequent alleles found in our sample. Significant differences in genotype and allelic distribution between African and European descents were observed for CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genes. CYP3A4*1B was observed in higher frequency in African descents (0.379) than in European descents (0.098), and European descents showed higher frequency of CYP3A5*3 (0.810) than African descents (0.523). Our results indicate that only a few polymorphisms would have impact in pharmacogenetic testing in South Brazilians. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required also among other Brazilian regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.