ArticleEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2014
Multigeneration impacts on Daphnia magna of carbon nanomaterials with differing core structures and functionalizations.
Article in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanomaterials' Multigenerational Effects by Single and Joint Exposure in Non-mammalian Models.Environmental toxicology · 2026Review
- Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity Effects of a Magnetic Zeolite Composite inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Multigenerational Effects of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles onInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Daphnia as a model organism to probe biological responses to nanomaterials-from individual to population effects via adverse outcome pathways.Frontiers in toxicology · 2023Review
- Article
- Multigenerational Exposure to WCCo Nanomaterials-Epigenetics in the Soil InvertebrateNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- The toxic influence and biodegradation of carbon nanofibers in freshwater invertebrates of the families Gammaridae, Ephemerellidae, and Chironomidae.Toxicology reports · 2020Article
- Matricidal hatching can induce multi-generational effects in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans after dietary exposure to nanoparticles.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018Article
- Multigenerational effects of copper nanomaterials (CuONMs) are different of those of CuClScientific reports · 2017Article
- Considerations of Environmentally Relevant Test Conditions for Improved Evaluation of Ecological Hazards of Engineered Nanomaterials.Environmental science & technology · 2016Article
- Multigenerational exposure to silver ions and silver nanoparticles reveals heightened sensitivity and epigenetic memory in Caenorhabditis elegans.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2016Article
- Emergent Properties and Toxicological Considerations for Nanohybrid Materials in Aquatic Systems.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014Review
- Effects of surface-engineered nanoparticle-based dispersants for marine oil spills on the model organism Artemia franciscana.Environmental science & technology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several classes of contaminants have been shown to have multigenerational impacts once a parental generation has been exposed. Acute and chronic toxicity are described for several types of nanomaterials in the literature; however, no information is available on the impact of nanomaterials on future generations of organisms after the exposure is removed. In the present study, the authors examined the impacts of carbon nanomaterials (CNMs), including fullerenes (C60), single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) with neutral, positive, and negative functional groups to F1 and F2 generation daphnids after an F0 exposure. Data from the present study indicate that multigenerational toxicity is present with certain nanomaterial exposures and is highly dependent on the surface chemistry of the nanomaterial. Many CNMs that showed toxicity to exposed F0 daphnids in previous experiments did not induce multigenerational toxicity. Certain nanomaterials, however, such as C60-malonate, SWCNTs, SWCNT-CONH2 , and MWCNTs, caused a significant decrease in either survival or reproduction in F1 daphnids; and SWCNT-CONH2 decreased reproduction out to the F2 generation. Impacts of nanomaterials on F1 and F2 size were small and lacked clear patterns, indicating that CNMs have minimal multigenerational impacts on size. Industries should take into account how surface chemistry influences nanomaterial toxicity to future generations of organisms to create sustainable nanomaterials that do not harm freshwater ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.