SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2014
Physical health care monitoring for people with serious mental illness.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guideline
- Pooled it
- The role of pharmacy in the management of cardiometabolic risk, metabolic syndrome and related diseases in severe mental illness: a mixed-methods systematic literature review.Systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Smoking cessation advice for people with serious mental illness.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- The Role of Siblings in Caring for Middle-Aged and Older People With Severe Mental Illness: A Scoping Review.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Article
- The Impact of Digital Technology on the Physical Health of Older Workers: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Article
- Reducing patient surge: community based social networks as first responders.Natural hazards (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2021Article
- Interventions to increase access to or uptake of physical health screening in people with severe mental illness: a realist review.BMJ open · 2018Review
- Improving life expectancy in people with serious mental illness: should we place more emphasis on primary prevention?The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2017Article
- Oral health education (advice and training) for people with serious mental illness.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Review
- The effectiveness of specialist roles in mental health metabolic monitoring: a retrospective cross-sectional comparison study.BMC psychiatry · 2014Article
- Serious mental illness and the role of primary care.Current psychiatry reports · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent guidance suggests that we should monitor the physical health of people with serious mental illness, and there has been a significant financial investment over recent years to provide this.
objectivesTo assess the effectiveness of physical health monitoring, compared with standard care for people with serious mental illness. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (October 2009, update in October 2012), which is based on regular searches of CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised clinical trials focusing on physical health monitoring versus standard care, or comparing i) self monitoring versus monitoring by a healthcare professional; ii) simple versus complex monitoring; iii) specific versus non-specific checks; iv) once only versus regular checks; or v) different guidance materials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Initially, review authors (GT, AC, SM) independently screened the search results and identified three studies as possibly fulfilling the review's criteria. On examination, however, all three were subsequently excluded. Forty-two additional citations were identified in October 2012 and screened by two review authors (JX and MW), 11 of which underwent full screening. MAIN
resultsNo relevant randomised trials which assess the effectiveness of physical health monitoring in people with serious mental illness have been completed. We identified one ongoing study. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is still no evidence from randomised trials to support or refute current guidance and practice. Guidance and practice are based on expert consensus, clinical experience and good intentions rather than high quality evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.