Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24441932›Full record

ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2014

The neurologist's dilemma: a comprehensive clinical review of Bell's palsy, with emphasis on current management trends.

Anthony Zandian, Stephen Osiro, Ryan Hudson, Irfan M Ali, Petru Matusz, Shane R Tubbs, Marios Loukas

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 161 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Procedural-Based Contemporary Management of Bell's Palsy Long-Term Sequelae: A Narrative Review.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Bell palsy.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anthony ZandianDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, St. George's University, St. George's, Grenada.
Stephen OsiroDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, St. George's University, St. George's, Grenada.
Ryan HudsonDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, St. George's University, St. George's, Grenada.
Irfan M AliDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, St. George's University, St. George's, Grenada.
Petru MatuszDepartment of Anatomy, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Dentistry, Timisoara, Romania.
Shane R TubbsPediatric Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital, Birmingham, USA.
Marios LoukasDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, St. George's University, St. George, Grenada.
St. George's University · GD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advances in Bell's palsy (BP) were reviewed to assess the current trends in its management and prognosis. MATERIAL/

methodsWe retrieved the literature on BP using the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Key words and phrases used during the search included 'Bell's palsy', 'Bell's phenomenon', 'facial palsy', and 'idiopathic facial paralysis'. Emphasis was placed on articles and randomized controlled trails (RCTs) published within the last 5 years.

resultsBP is currently considered the leading disorder affecting the facial nerve. The literature is replete with theories of its etiology, but the reactivation of herpes simplex virus isoform 1 (HSV-1) and/or herpes zoster virus (HZV) from the geniculate ganglia is now the most strongly suspected cause. Despite the advancements in neuroimaging techniques, the diagnosis of BP remains one of exclusion. In addition, most patients with BP recover spontaneously within 3 weeks.

conclusionsCorticosteroids are currently the drug of choice when medical therapy is needed. Antivirals, in contrast, are not superior to placebo according to most reliable studies. At the time of publication, there is no consensus as to the benefit of acupuncture or surgical decompression of the facial nerve. Long-term therapeutic agents and adjuvant medications for BP are necessary due to recurrence and intractable cases. In the future, large RCTs will be required to determine whether BP is associated with an increased risk of stroke.

Indexed as

Herpesvirus 1, HumanHerpesvirus 3, HumanBell PalsyDisease ManagementFemaleHerpes Simplex Virus Protein Vmw65HumansHydroxycorticosteroidsMalePrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHerpes Simplex Virus Protein Vmw65Hydroxycorticosteroids

Identifiers

PMID24441932
PMCPMC3907546
OpenAlexW2009315811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.