ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2014
Chemoprevention of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: no time to lose momentum.
Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association of cancer metabolism-related proteins with oral carcinogenesis - indications for chemoprevention and metabolic sensitizing of oral squamous cell carcinoma?Journal of translational medicine · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prospects for chemoprevention to reduce the incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) are great. The tissue at risk for harboring disease is relatively accessible for examination and biopsy. Patients appropriate for study can be easily identified by their risk factors and the presence of premalignant lesions. Our understanding of the pathogenesis of SCCHN is ever increasing, and offers new opportunities to explore strategies for prevention therapies. In this issue of Cancer Prevention Research, Saba and colleagues report on a phase Ib trial of celecoxib plus erlotinib to prevent progression to higher-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma in patients with oral premalignant lesions. The overall response rate was 57%, though by the time of last analysis, 85% of patients relapsed. In this commentary, challenges to the success of chemoprevention clinical trials for SCCHN, such as pitfalls in using surrogate biomarkers and reversal of histologic premalignant changes as study endpoints, are discussed. In addition, strategies to help ensure further development in the field of head and neck cancer prevention are reviewed. These include focusing efforts on tobacco cessation and human papillomavirus vaccination, targeting key molecular drivers of head and neck carcinogenesis, and focusing on combination strategies that have the potential to eradicate premalignant clones, even if some toxicity is encountered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24441671What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.