Intensive care research and publication in India: quo vadis?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The story of critical care in Asia: a narrative review.Journal of intensive care · 2021
   Review
2. Feasibility and Accuracy of a Nonmedical Research Person in Assimilation and Calculation of Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation Scores in an Indian Intensive Care Unit.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2018
   Article
3. Advances in Pediatric Critical Care Research in India.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2018
   Review
4. Ten major priorities for intensive care in India.Intensive care medicine · 2015
   Article
5. Caring for the critically ill in developing countries: a perspective from India.Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as