Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24441050›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2014

Burn injury, gender and cancer risk: population-based cohort study using data from Scotland and Western Australia.

Janine M Duke, Jacqui Bauer, Mark W Fear, Suzanne Rea, Fiona M Wood, James Boyd

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Cells · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. [Burn injury should be considered as a chronic disease].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The accuracy of burn diagnosis codes in health administrative data: A validation study.Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Janine M DukeBurn Injury Research Unit, School of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Jacqui Bauer
Mark W Fear
Suzanne Rea
Fiona M Wood
James Boyd
Curtin University · AUPrincess Margaret Hospital for Children · AUUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the risk of cancer and potential gender effects in persons hospitalised with burn injury.

designPopulation-based retrospective cohort study using record-linkage systems in Scotland and Western Australia.

participantsRecords of 37 890 and 23 450 persons admitted with a burn injury in Scotland and Western Australia, respectively, from 1983 to 2008. Deidentified extraction of all linked hospital morbidity records, mortality and cancer records were provided by the Information Service Division Scotland and the Western Australian Data Linkage Service.

main outcome measuresTotal and gender-specific number of observed and expected cases of total ('all sites') and site-specific cancers and standardised incidence ratios (SIRs).

resultsFrom 1983 to 2008, for female burn survivors, there was a greater number of observed versus expected notifications of total cancer with 1011 (SIR, 95% CI 1.3, 1.2 to 1.4) and 244 (SIR, 95% CI 1.12, 1.05 to 1.30), respectively, for Scotland and Western Australia. No statistically significant difference in total cancer risk was found for males. Significant excesses in observed cancers among burn survivors (combined gender) in Scotland and Western Australian were found for buccal cavity, liver, larynx and respiratory tract and for cancers of the female genital tract.

conclusionsResults from the Scotland data confirmed the increased risk of total ('all sites') cancer previously observed among female burn survivors in Western Australia. The gender dimorphism observed in this study may be related to the role of gender in the immune response to burn injury. More research is required to understand the underlying mechanism(s) that may link burn injury with an increased risk of some cancers.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBurnsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentScotlandSex DistributionSex FactorsEpidemiologyPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID24441050
PMCPMC3902327
OpenAlexW2105220241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.