Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24440648›Full record

Trial reportBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation2014

Treosulfan, fludarabine, and 2-Gy total body irradiation followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia.

Boglarka Gyurkocza, Jonathan Gutman, Eneida R Nemecek, Merav Bar, Filippo Milano, Aravind Ramakrishnan, Bart Scott, Min Fang, Brent Wood, John M Pagel and 8 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Treosulfan-Based Conditioning for Treatment of Marrow Failure Disorders.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2017
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. New age HCT conditioning regimens: what works and why?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Priorities for Improving Outcomes for Nonmalignant Blood Diseases: A Report from the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Boglarka GyurkoczaClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: bgyurkoc@fhcrc.org.
Jonathan GutmanDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado.
Eneida R NemecekKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Merav BarClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Filippo MilanoClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Aravind RamakrishnanClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Bart ScottClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Min FangClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Brent WoodMedac GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
John M PagelClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Joachim BaumgartDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washing School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Colleen DelaneyClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Richard T MaziarzKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Brenda M SandmaierClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Elihu H EsteyClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Frederick R AppelbaumClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Barry E StorerClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Hans Joachim DeegClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of Washington · USOregon Health & Science University · USMedac (Germany) · DEUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

VIRUS-MEDIATED MYELOSUPPRESSIONP01CA018029 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Geoffrey Roger HILL · 1985 to 2026
$128.4M
UNRELATED AND HLA-MISMATCHED RELATED DONOR TRANSPLANTSP01HL036444 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI RAWLINGS, DAVID J · 1986 to 2010
$25.9M
Career Development in Clinical Hematology ResearchK12HL087165 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ABKOWITZ, JANIS L · 2006 to 2016
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA018029NCI NIH HHS P01 CA018029NHLBI NIH HHS HL036444NHLBI NIH HHS HL087165-06NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL087165NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL036444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers curative therapy for many patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, post-HCT relapse remains a major problem, particularly in patients with high-risk cytogenetics. In this prospective phase II trial, we assessed the efficacy and toxicity of treosulfan, fludarabine, and 2 Gy total body irradiation (TBI) as conditioning for allogeneic HCT in patients with MDS or AML. Ninety-six patients with MDS (n = 36: 15 refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia, 10 refractory anemia with excess blasts type 1, 10 refractory anemia with excess blasts type 2, 1 chronic myelomonocytic leukemia type 1) or AML (n = 60: 35 first complete remission [CR], 18 second CR, 3 advanced CR, 4 refractory relapse) were enrolled; median age was 51 (range, 1 to 60) years. Twelve patients had undergone a prior HCT with high-intensity conditioning. Patients received 14 g/m(2)/day treosulfan i.v. on days -6 to -4, 30 mg/m(2)/day fludarabine i.v. on days -6 to -2, and 2 Gy TBI on day 0, followed by infusion of hematopoietic cells from related (n = 27) or unrelated (n = 69) donors. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus and methotrexate. With a median follow-up of 30 months, the 2-year overall survival (OS), relapse incidence, and nonrelapse mortality were 73%, 27%, and 8%, respectively. The incidences of grades II to IV (III to IV) acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease were 59% (10%) and 47%, respectively. Two-year OS was not significantly different between MDS patients with poor-risk and good/intermediate-risk cytogenetics (69% and 85%, respectively) or between AML patients with unfavorable and favorable/intermediate-risk cytogenetics (64% and 76%, respectively). In AML patients, minimal residual disease (MRD; n = 10) at the time of HCT predicted higher relapse incidence (70% versus 18%) and lower OS (41% versus 79%) at 2 years, when compared with patients without MRD. In conclusion, treosulfan, fludarabine, and low-dose TBI provided effective conditioning for allogeneic HCT in patients with MDS or AML and resulted in low relapse incidence, regardless of cytogenetic risk. In patients with AML, MRD at the time of HCT remained a risk factor for post-HCT relapse.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAdolescentAdultBusulfanChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGraft vs Host DiseaseHumansInfantLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedMyeloablative AgonistsMyelodysplastic SyndromesNeoplasm, ResidualBusulfanfludarabineMyeloablative AgoniststreosulfanVidarabineAllogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantationAMLMDSTotal body irradiationTreosulfan

Identifiers

PMID24440648
PMCPMC3996925
OpenAlexW2044357856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.