Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24440119›Full record

ArticleResearch in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP

Using a conflict conceptual framework to describe challenges to coordinated patient care from the physicians' and pharmacists' perspective.

Leigh Maxwell, Olufunmilola K Odukoya, Jamie A Stone, Michelle A Chui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leigh MaxwellDepartment of Communication Studies, Edgewood College, Madison, WI 53711, USA.
Olufunmilola K OdukoyaDepartment of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, University of Pittsburgh, School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Jamie A StoneSocial & Administrative Sciences Division, University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Pharmacy, 777 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
Michelle A ChuiSocial & Administrative Sciences Division, University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Pharmacy, 777 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705, USA. Electronic address: mchui@pharmacy.wisc.edu.

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardKL2TR000428 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$6.2M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000428NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn an effort to increase cost-effectiveness of health care and reduce overall costs, patient-centered medical homes have been proposed to spur fundamental changes in the way primary care is delivered. One of the chief principles that describe a patient-centered medical home is that care is organized across all elements of the broader health care system, including community pharmacies.

objectivesTo identify and describe challenges derived from a conflict management framework to a physician-pharmacist approach to coordinating patient care.

methodsA descriptive, exploratory, non-experimental study was conducted in Wisconsin (U.S. State) from June to December, 2011. Data were collected through two rounds of face-to-face interviews with physicians and community pharmacists. The first round involved one-on-one interviews with pharmacists and physicians. The second round brought pharmacist-physician dyads together in an open-ended interview exploring issues raised in the first round. Content analysis was guided by a conflict management conceptual framework using NVivo 10 qualitative software.

resultsA total of four major themes emerged from the conflict analysis of interviews that illustrate challenges to coordinated patient care: Scarce resources, technology design and usability, insurance constraints, and laws and policy governing patient care. The study findings indicate that both groups of health care professionals work within an environment of conflict and have to negotiate the challenges and strains that exist in the current health care system. Their need to work together, or interdependence, is primarily challenged by scarce resources and external interference.

conclusionsEfforts to coordinate patient care through teams of inter-professional health care providers will be more successful if they acknowledge the inherent conflict that exists. Efforts should be made to provide an infrastructure for interdependence and to support interpersonal communication.

Indexed as

Conflict, PsychologicalCooperative BehaviorInterprofessional RelationsElectronic Health RecordsHealth ResourcesHumansInsurance, HealthLegislation, DrugPatient CarePharmacistsPhysiciansProfessional RoleWisconsinConflict managementInterprofessional teamworkPatient care coordinationPatient-centered medical homePhysician–pharmacist collaboration

Identifiers

PMID24440119
PMCPMC4065845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.