ReviewEuropean urology2014
Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer.
Review in European urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05603351 (ProstaPilot), which is not on this map. Cited by 483 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ProstaPilot: Prostate Cancer Screening Using MRI With an Abbreviated Protocol
Who cites it
483 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 939 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-aided diagnostic performance for prostate MRI: systematic review and meta-analysis.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Pooled it
- The Benefits and Harms of Screening for Prostate Cancer in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older: A Systematic Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Pooled it
- Aging and prostate health: meta-analytic insights into age-related prostatic disorders.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Integration of single-cell and bulk RNA-sequencing data reveals the prognostic potential of epithelial gene markers for prostate cancer.Molecular oncology · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer histology identification and grading.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2023Pooled it
- Development and pilot testing of a prostate cancer polygenic risk report.BMC medical genomics · 2026Trial
- Comparing the effectiveness of prostate cancer screening protocols: European Association of Urology- and European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer-based strategies.International journal of cancer · 2026Trial
- Prostate Cancer Screening with PSA and MRI Followed by Targeted Biopsy Only.The New England journal of medicine · 2022Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prostate Cancer Screening in the UK: A Decision Model Analysis Based on the CAP Trial.PharmacoEconomics · 2022Trial
- Population-based randomized trial of screening for clinically significant prostate cancer ProScreen: a pilot study.BJU international · 2022Trial
- A nationwide histopathology study reflecting the impact of the introduction of MRI in the diagnostic trajectory of prostate cancer in routine clinical care.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Article
- Methodological Pluralism in Surgical Evidence: from Concept to Practice.Surgery in practice and science · 2026Review
- Evaluation of a Methylated Circulating Tumour DNA Panel for Detection and Disease Stratification in Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Disparities in cancer survival by socioeconomic status: findings from a population-based study of 942 241 Australians from 1980 to 2019.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Plasma Proteomic Profiling Was Used to Discover a Biochemical Recurrence Prediction Model for Prostate Cancer.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026Article
- Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Patterns and Metastatic Prostate Cancer in US Veterans.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Inflammatory and Epigenetic Biomarkers in Prostate Disease: Current Evidence, Clinical Limitations, and Future Multimarker Strategies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Primary MRI versus PSA-gated scans in Prostate Cancer Screening - how ready is it for mainstream implementation?Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Review
- A Gene Expression Tumor Signature Optimizing Partial Area-Under-the-Curve (pAUC) to Improve Specificity for Indolent Prostate Cancer.The Prostate · 2026Article
- The evolving role of PSA in prostate cancer screening: revisiting the evidence in the era of personalized medicine.Advances in laboratory medicine · 2026Review
423 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
contextAlthough prostate cancer (PCa) screening reduces the incidence of advanced disease and mortality, trade-offs include overdiagnosis and resultant overtreatment.
objectiveTo review primary data on PCa overdiagnosis and overtreatment. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Electronic searches were conducted in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and Embase from inception to July 2013 for original articles on PCa overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Supplemental articles were identified through hand searches. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The lead-time and excess-incidence approaches are the main ways used to estimate overdiagnosis in epidemiological studies, with estimates varying widely. The estimated number of PCa cases needed to be diagnosed to save a life has ranged from 48 down to 5 with increasing follow-up. In clinical studies, generally lower rates of overdiagnosis have been reported based on the frequency of low-grade minimal tumors at radical prostatectomy (1.7-46.8%). Autopsy studies have reported PCa in 18.5-38.5%, although not all are low grade or low volume. Factors influencing overdiagnosis include the study population, screening protocol, and background incidence, limiting generalizability between settings. Reported rates of overtreatment vary widely in the literature, although contemporary international studies suggest increasing use of conservative management.
conclusionsEpidemiological, clinical, and autopsy studies have been used to examine PCa overdiagnosis, with estimates ranging widely from 1.7% to 67%. Correspondingly, estimates of overtreatment vary widely based on patient features and may be declining internationally. Careful patient selection for screening and reducing overtreatment are important to preserve the benefits and reduce the downstream harms of prostate-specific antigen testing. Because all of these estimates are extremely population and context specific, this must be considered when using these data to inform policy. PATIENT SUMMARY: Screening reduces spread and death from prostate cancer (PCa) but overdiagnoses some low-risk tumors that may not have caused harm. Because treatment has potential side effects, it is critical that not all patients with PCa receive aggressive treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.