Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24439270›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research2014

Reliability and validity of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis.

Jean Addington, Hely Shah, Lu Liu, Donald Addington

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genetics of suicide ideation. A role for inflammation and neuroplasticity?European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jean AddingtonHotchkiss Brain Institute, Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: jmadding@ucalgary.ca.
Hely ShahDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Canada.
Lu LiuHotchkiss Brain Institute, Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Donald AddingtonHotchkiss Brain Institute, Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of Calgary · CAAllen Institute for Brain Science · US

Funding

"7/9" Predictors and Mechanisms of Conversion to PsychosisU01MH081984 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY · PI ADDINGTON, JEAN M · 2008 to 2018
$4.2M
NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH081984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessment of depression in individuals who are considered to be at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis is important as high rates of depression have been reported in CHR individuals. The Calgary Depression Scale (CDSS) is the most widely used scale for assessing depression in schizophrenia. It has excellent psychometric properties, internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, sensitivity, specificity, and discriminant and convergent validity. The aim of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the CDSS in a sample of youth at CHR for psychosis. Participants were assessed for depression, presence of axis 1 mood disorders, and prodromal symptoms using the CDSS, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Disorders (SCID-1), and the Scale of Prodromal Symptoms (SOPS). The CDSS total score as well as all individual items, except "guilty ideas of reference," were significantly associated with the presence of a major depressive disorder. Significant correlations were observed between CDSS total score and the dysphoric mood item on the SOPS. There was some evidence of overlap between the CDSS and both attenuated positive symptoms and negative symptoms as assessed by the SOPS. It is concluded that CDSS is a reliable scale suitable for assessing depression in individuals considered to be at CHR for psychosis.

Indexed as

Psychiatric Status Rating ScalesSchizophrenic PsychologyAdolescentAdultCanadaDepressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePredictive Value of TestsPsychotic DisordersReproducibility of ResultsRiskSchizophreniaStatistics as TopicCalgary Depression Scale for SchizophreniaClinical high riskDepressionPsychosisSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID24439270
PMCPMC3982913
OpenAlexW2026508141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.