Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24437709›Full record

ReviewChemical research in toxicology2014

DNA adductomics.

Silvia Balbo, Robert J Turesky, Peter W Villalta

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical research in toxicology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Applicability of HILIC-SPE pretreatment for the quantitation of NAnalytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Novel Techniques for Mapping DNA Damage and Repair in the Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Mass Spectral Library for DNA Adductomics.Chemical research in toxicology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Silvia BalboDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and ‡The Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.
Robert J Turesky
Peter W Villalta
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Douglas Yee · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
Synthetic Approaches to Carcinogen-Linked OligonucleotidesP01CA160032 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI STONE, MICHAEL P · 2012 to 2022
$14.0M
Chemical markers of heterocyclic aromatic amines for human biomonitoringR01CA122320 · NCI · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI TURESKY, ROBERT J. · 2007 to 2018
$4.8M
New biomonitoring methodologies to measure DNA adducts in human tissuesR01ES019564 · NIEHS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI TURESKY, ROBERT J. · 2011 to 2020
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA160032NCI NIH HHS P01CA1600321NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NCI NIH HHS P30CA077598-11NCI NIH HHS R01 CA122320NCI NIH HHS R01CA122320NIEHS NIH HHS R01ES0195NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES019564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systems toxicology is a broad-based approach to describe many of the toxicological features that occur within a living system under stress or subjected to exogenous or endogenous exposures. The ultimate goal is to capture an overview of all exposures and the ensuing biological responses of the body. The term exposome has been employed to refer to the totality of all exposures, and systems toxicology investigates how the exposome influences health effects and consequences of exposures over a lifetime. The tools to advance systems toxicology include high-throughput transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and adductomics, which is still in its infancy. A well-established methodology for the comprehensive measurement of DNA damage resulting from every day exposures is not fully developed. During the past several decades, the (32)P-postlabeling technique has been employed to screen the damage to DNA induced by multiple classes of genotoxicants; however, more robust, specific, and quantitative methods have been sought to identify and quantify DNA adducts. Although triple quadrupole and ion trap mass spectrometry, particularly when using multistage scanning (LC-MS(n)), have shown promise in the field of DNA adductomics, it is anticipated that high-resolution and accurate-mass LC-MS(n) instrumentation will play a major role in assessing global DNA damage. Targeted adductomics should also benefit greatly from improved triple quadrupole technology. Once the analytical MS methods are fully mature, DNA adductomics along with other -omics tools will contribute greatly to the field of systems toxicology.

Indexed as

Chromatography, High Pressure LiquidDNADNA AdductsDNA DamageMass SpectrometryMetabolomicsProteomicsXenobioticsDNADNA AdductsXenobiotics

Identifiers

PMID24437709
PMCPMC3997222
OpenAlexW4245040372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.