ReviewClinics in colon and rectal surgery2013
Biologic therapy and surgery for crohn disease.
Review in Clinics in colon and rectal surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgery in the age of biologics.Gastroenterology report · 2019Review
- Preoperative Ustekinumab Treatment Is Not Associated With Increased Postoperative Complications in Crohn's Disease: A Canadian Multi-Centre Observational Cohort Study.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018Article
- Is top-down therapy a more effective alternative to conventional step-up therapy for Crohn's disease?Annals of gastroenterologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 1998, infliximab, an antitumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF-α) antibody, was approved for use in the treatment of Crohn disease (CD). Since then, other biologic therapies, including adalimumab and certolizumab pegol (newer anti-TNF-α antibodies), and natalizumab, an antibody against alpha-4 integrin, have also been approved. Here, we review the published studies that examine the relationship between pre- and postoperative biologic therapy and postoperative complications in patients with CD. This body of literature is composed of numerous small, retrospective, heterogeneous studies that demonstrate conflicting and varied results. Overall, the receipt of biologic therapy in the pre- or postoperative period does not appear to significantly increase the risk of postoperative complications. It is, however, difficult to draw any firm conclusions based on the existing level of data. In the future, larger prospective studies are needed to better elucidate the true risks, if any, that the use of biologic therapy poses to patients with CD requiring operation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.