ReviewClinics in colon and rectal surgery2013
Use of robotics in colon and rectal surgery.
Review in Clinics in colon and rectal surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotic Revolution in Surgery: Diverse Applications Across Specialties and Future Prospects Review Article.Cureus · 2024Review
- Comparative Evaluation of the Short-Term Treatment Outcomes Between Open, Laparoscopic- and Robotic-Assisted Surgical Approaches for Rectal Cancer Treatment.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2020Article
- Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: case-matched comparison of short-term surgical and functional outcomes between the da Vinci Xi and Si.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Article
- Totally robotic vs 3D laparoscopic colectomy: A single centers preliminary experience.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Observational
- The evolution of image-guided lumbosacral spine surgery.Annals of translational medicine · 2015Review
- Robot-assisted one-stage resection of rectal cancer with liver and lung metastases.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Article
- Pathologic processing of the total mesorectal excision.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2015Review
- Introducing an enhanced recovery after surgery program in colorectal surgery: a single center experience.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Article
- Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: current immediate clinical and oncological outcomes.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Article
- Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review of current practice.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pace of innovation in the field of surgery continues to accelerate. As new technologies are developed in combination with industry and clinicians, specialized patient care improves. In the field of colon and rectal surgery, robotic systems offer clinicians many alternative ways to care for patients. From having the ability to round remotely to improved visualization and dissection in the operating room, robotic assistance can greatly benefit clinical outcomes. Although the field of robotics in surgery is still in its infancy, many groups are actively investigating technologies that will assist clinicians in caring for their patients. As these technologies evolve, surgeons will continue to find new and innovative ways to utilize the systems for improved patient care and comfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.