ReviewClinics in colon and rectal surgery2013
Working with existing databases.
Review in Clinics in colon and rectal surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing paediatric robotic surgery: building the foundation with databases.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Statewide Variation in Practices and Charges for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax in Maryland, United States: A Retrospective Study.Journal of chest surgery · 2025Article
- A retrospective study on the impact of radiotherapy on the survival outcomes of small cell lung cancer patients based on the SEER database.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A sampling strategy for longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses using a large national claims database.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Ridiculously good writing: How to write like a pro and publish like a boss.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2022Article
- Advanced age is not the decisive factor in chemotherapy of small cell lung cancer: a population-based study.Aging · 2022Article
- Comparisons of prognosis prediction accuracy between modified and unmodified versions of 8Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Exploration of the optimal number of regional lymph nodes removed for resected N0 NSCLC patients: A population-based study.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Hospital teaching status on the outcomes of patients with esophageal variceal bleeding in the United States.World journal of hepatology · 2020Article
- Big Data vs. Clinical Trials in HPB Surgery.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020Review
- Impact of Hospital Case Volume on Outcomes Following Radical Nephrectomy and Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy.European urology oncology · 2019Article
- The opportunities and shortcomings of using big data and national databases for sarcoma research.Cancer · 2019Review
- Common Pitfalls of Head and Neck Research Using Cancer Registries.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2019Review
- Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and SEER-Medicare Databases: Use in Clinical Research for Improving Colorectal Cancer Outcomes.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2019Review
- The challenges of tumor genetic diversity.Cancer · 2017Review
- Surgical research using national databases.Annals of translational medicine · 2016Review
- Implications of Overdiagnosis: Impact on Screening Mammography Practices.Population health management · 2015Review
- Timing to surgery of Chiari malformation type 1 affects complication types: An analysis of 13,812 patients.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineArticle
- Inpatient Maternal Mortality in the United States, 2002-2014.Nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Outcomes research has established itself as an integral part of surgical research as physicians and hospitals are increasingly required to demonstrate attainment of performance markers and surgical safety indicators. Large-volume and clinical and administrative databases are used to study regional practice pattern variations, health care disparities, and resource utilization. Understanding the unique strengths and limitations of these large databases is critical to performing quality surgical outcomes research. In the current work, we review the currently available large-volume databases including selection processes, modes of analyses, data application, and limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.